Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3965/2022 Of Padma v. The Income Tax...

Wp/3965/2022 Of Padma v. The Income Tax Central Processing Center

High Court 08 Dec 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Wp/3965/2022 Of Padma v. The Income Tax Central Processing Center
Date of order
08 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/3965/2022 Of Padma v. The Income Tax Central Processing Center, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.3965/2022 Smt. Padma W/o Adv. Narayan Bhattad, aged about 68 Yrs., Occ. Household, R/o ‘Shivam’, Abhyankar Road, nearDr. Mahurkar Hospital, Dhantoli, Nagpur....Petitioner - Versus - 1.The Income Tax Central ProcessingCenter, through its Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC, having office at CPC, Post Bag No.1, Electronic City Post Office, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560 500. 2.The Pr. Commissioner of IncomeTax Nagpur -1, Nagpur, having office at Aayakar Bhavan, Telangkhedi Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur - 440 001.Tax Nagpur -1, Nagpur, having office at Aayakar Bhavan, Telangkhedi Road, Civil Lines, Nagpur - 440 001. ... s Respondent ----------------- Mr. S.V. Bhutada, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. ---------------- CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND M. W. CHANDWANI, JJ. DATE : 8.12.2022 ORAL JUDGMENT(Per Sunil B. Shukre, J.) Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.Heard finally by consent of learned counsel for the parties. 2.Copy of the communication dated 5.12.2022,supplying instructions to the learned counsel, is placed on recordby the learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 and 2. It is marked“A” for identification. The document “A” shows that the IncomeTax Officer is willing to recall the impugned order and reconsiderthe issue and, therefore, a request has been made to inform thisCourt regarding remitting back of the dispute to the JurisdictionalAssessing Officer with liberty to allow the claim of the assesseeafter verification and in accordance with law, with a direction tothe petitioner to cooperate during the said proceedings. 3.Learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and,therefore, petition is disposed of by treating the impugned order as recalled and the matter is remitted back to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer with liberty to allow the claim of the assesseeafter verification and in accordance with law with direction to thepetitioner to cooperate during the said proceedings. 4.Rule is made absolute in the above terms. No orders as tocosts. (M. W. CHANDWANI, J.) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.) Tambaskar.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan