Case LawHigh Court › Wp/3980/2021 Of Ms. Latha Shivanna v. Th...

Wp/3980/2021 Of Ms. Latha Shivanna v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 25 Feb 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/3980/2021 Of Ms. Latha Shivanna v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
25 Feb 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/3980/2021 Of Ms. Latha Shivanna v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION No.3980/2021 (TIT) BETWEEN: Ms. Latha Shivanna, Wife of Shri Subbegowda Shivanna Aged about 49 years, # 480, 5[th ]Main, 9[th ]Cross, Dollars Colony, RMV 2[nd] Stage, Bengaluru - 560 094. … Petitioner (By Sri Gautam S. Bharadwaj, Advocate) AND: 1. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, 3[rd] Floor, Central Revenue Building, Queens Road, Bengaluru - 560 001. 3[rd] Floor, Central Revenue Building, Queens Road, Bengaluru - 560 001. 2. The Tax Recovery Officer, Central Circle 2(2), Central Revenue Building, Queen's Road, Bengaluru - 560 001. Central Circle 2(2), Central Revenue Building, Queen's Road, Bengaluru - 560 001. 3. Assessing Officer, Central Circle 2(2), Central Revenue Building, Queens Road, Bengaluru - 560 001. Central Circle 2(2), Central Revenue Building, Queens Road, Bengaluru - 560 001. … Respondents (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned order dated 15.12.2020 issued by the R-2 attaching residential property bearing No.1001 B Block Vaishnavi Splendour, Bengaluru which is annexed as Annexure-A and etc. This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORDER The petitioner has sought for issuance of a writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 15.12.2020 at Annexure-A. In the alternative and without prejudice to prayer (A), the petitioner has sought for issuance of a writ of mandamus to consider the application dated 05.02.2021 made under Rule 66(2) of the Second Schedule to the Income Tax Act, 1961 produced at Annexure-G and other representations dated 22.02.2020, 12.01.2021 and 18.01.2021 in a time bound manner. 2. Upon notice, Sri K.V.Aravind, learned counsel appears for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not insist consideration of prayer (A) at the time of hearing of the matter. 4. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on merits, the respondent No.2 is directed to consider the application at Annexure-G dated 05.02.2021 and other representations of the petitioner dated 22.02.2020, 12.01.2021 and 18.01.2021 within a period of two weeks from the date of release of the certified copy of this order, in accordance with law. All contentions of the parties are kept open. Sd/- JUDGE VGR
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan