Wp/3997/2019 Of K.vignesh Prabhu v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
20 Feb 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/3997/2019 Of K.vignesh Prabhu v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Feb 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/3997/2019 Of K.vignesh Prabhu v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED 20.02.2019
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTHW.P. No.3997 of 2019andWMP. Nos.4453 & 4454 of 2019
Mr.K.Vignesh Prabhu... Petitioner-vs-
1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1) Erode, Income Tax Office, 15, Gandhi Road, Erode- 638 001
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), CIT (A), Coimbatore, Race Course Road, Coimbatore-641 018.3.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, 47A, Park Road, CD Building, Erode – 638 003. .. Respondents
PETITION filed under Article 226 of The Constitutionof India praying for the issuance of Writ of CertiorarifiedMandamus to call for the records relating to notice dated01.02.2019, issued U/s.226 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961by the 1[st] respondent to the 3[rd] respondent in respect ofaccounts of M/s.V.K.Textile Processors PAN. ,quash the same and consequently forbear the 1[st] respondentfrom attaching the Over Draft and Cash Credit Accounts ofM/s.V.K.Textile Processesors PAN. .
For Petitioner : Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalanfor G.R.Associates.For Respondents : Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, Standing counsel for R1 & R2.----------
Mr.Niranjan Rajagopalan, challenges an order ofattachment of Bank account and prays for a writ ofCertiorarified Mandamus quashing notice dated 01.02.2019
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
issued under Section 226 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961by the 1[st] and 3[rd] respondent and an order forbearing themfrom attaching the Over Draft and Cash Credit Accounts ofthe petitioner.
2. Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned standing counsel whohas taken notice for the Income Tax Department confirmstoday that the application for stay of recovery filed bythe petitioner has been disposed on 12.02.2019 by the firstrespondent directing the petitioner to pay 20% of thedisputed demands on or before 27.02.2019. The Bankattachment impugned before me has been lifted.
3. In such circumstances, nothing survives in thisWrit Petition and the same is closed recording theaforesaid statement of the learned standing counsel.Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS)
//True Copy//
rkpTo
Sub Assistant Registrar
1.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 2 (1) Erode, Income Tax Office, 15, Gandhi Road, Erode- 638 001.
2.The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), CIT (A), Coimbatore, Race Course Road, Coimbatore-641 018.
3.The Branch Manager, Canara Bank, 47A, Park Road, CD Building, Erode – 638 003.
+1cc to Mr.G.R.Associates , Advocate SR.No. 15667+1cc to Mr.A.P.Srinivas , Advocate SR.No. 15629
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.