Case LawHigh Court › Wp/4165/2012 Of Shri Mahila Grih Udyog L...

Wp/4165/2012 Of Shri Mahila Grih Udyog Lijjat Papad v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 16 Jul 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp/4165/2012 Of Shri Mahila Grih Udyog Lijjat Papad v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Jul 2012
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/4165/2012 Of Shri Mahila Grih Udyog Lijjat Papad v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: In view of this, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Khan* W.P. No.4165 of 2012 16.7.2012. Shri Mukesh Agrawal for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Lal for the respondents. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that for the following relief this petition was filed : “(i)to direct stay of recovery of demand for AY 2008-09 till the decision of petitioner's stay application by ITAT. (ii)To direct respondent no.1 to adjust the amount of Rs.10 lacs with interest u/s 244A which was paid in 2005-06 which is refundable to the petitioner because of decision of ITAT in 2005-06. (iii)To direct respondent no.4 to decide the stay application and appeal of the petitioner within a certain time frame; & (iv)To issue any other writ or order or direction which the Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” It is submitted by Shri Agrawal that in the reply the respondents have stated that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner as the appeal preferred by the petitioner is still pending and in view of the stand taken by the respondents in the return, petitioner be permitted to withdraw this petition. Shri Lal has no objection if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition on the aforesaid ground. In view of this, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. (Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan