In Wp/4166/2012 Of Shri Mahila Gruh Udyog Lijjat Papad v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of this, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Khan*
W.P. No.4166 of 2012
16.7.2012.
Shri Mukesh Agrawal for the petitioner. Shri Sanjay Lal for the respondents.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that for the following relief this petition was filed :
It is submitted by Shri Agrawal that in the reply the respondents have stated that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner as the appeal preferred by the petitioner is still pending and in view of the stand taken by the respondents in the return, petitioner be permitted to withdraw this petition.
Shri Lal has no objection if the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the petition on the aforesaid ground.
In view of this, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs.
(Krishn Kumar Lahoti) (Smt.Vimla Jain) Judge
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue