In Wp/424/2011 Of Manu Hills Cottages v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2011) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.424 OF 2011AND
WRIT PETITION NO.429 OF 2011
Mauli Hills Cottages
V/s.The Income Tax Officer Ward3(1) Pune & Anr
..... Petitioners
..... Respondents
----
Mr.Mihir Naniwadekar i/by S.N.Inamdar for the petitioners.
Mr.Vimal Gupta for the respondents.
----
CORAM : J.P.DEVADHAR &
MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.
DATE :31/1/ 2011
P.C.
1.In view of the re-assessment order passed pursuant to the notice
impugned in the petitions, Counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw the petitions with liberty to resort to the appellate proceedings. Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed. Both the petitions disposed off accordingly with no order as to costs.
(MRS.MRIDULA BHATKAR,J)
(J.P.DEVADHAR,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue