Case LawHigh Court › Wp/42513/2015 Of M/S. Ivrcl-Kbl-Meil (Jo...

Wp/42513/2015 Of M/S. Ivrcl-Kbl-Meil (Joint Venture) v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 01 Feb 2016 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/42513/2015 Of M/S. Ivrcl-Kbl-Meil (Joint Venture) v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
01 Feb 2016
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/42513/2015 Of M/S. Ivrcl-Kbl-Meil (Joint Venture) v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2016) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON’BLR SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY WRIT PETITION NOs.42513, 42677, 42944 AND 43061 OF 2015 COMMON ORDER: {Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan} In all these Writ Petitions, the relief sought for is to grant refund of thetax deducted at source by the deductor/Government. Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of thepetitioner, would submit that as the respondents have, in their counteraffidavits stated that the refund is under process, it would suffice if this Courtwere to fix a time frame of two weeks for refund to be granted. Sri T.Vinod Kumar, leaned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax,on the other hand, would draw attention of this Court to paragraph No.4 of thecounter affidavit to submit, that an application, under Section 154, wassubmitted by the petitioner on 04.01.2016; and an order thereunder waspassed on 27.01.2016 determining the refund payable; and the Departmentwould require at least six weeks to grant refund. As the order under Section 154 was passed less than a week ago,we consider it appropriate to dispose of the Writ Petitions directing therespondents to refund the amount due within six weeks from today. The Writ Petitions are, accordingly, disposed of. There shall be noorder as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall standclosed. _______________________ (RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J) ___________________________ (M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J) 1[st] February 2016RRB
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan