Wp/4293/2006 Of Piaggio Vehicles Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
High Court
03 Jul 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/4293/2006 Of Piaggio Vehicles Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr
Date of order
03 Jul 2006
Assessment year(s)
1999-2000
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/4293/2006 Of Piaggio Vehicles Pvt.ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax And Anr, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.4293 OF 2006
WRIT PETITION NO.4293 OF 2006
Piaggio Vehicles Pvt. Ltd. ..Petitioner.
V/s.
Dy.Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr. ..Respondents.
Mr.S.J.Mehta & Arati Vissanji for petitioner.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale for respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
CORAM : V.C. DAGA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006.
DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006.
DATED : 3RD JULY, 2006.
P.C.:
P.C.:
Heard the learned counsel for the rival
parties. Perused petition.
2. In this case after receipt of the reasons
recorded for reopening of the assessment for the A.Y.
1999-2000, it was expected on the part of the
petitioner to file objections with the Assistant
Commissioner of Income Tax (assessing officer), Pune,
in view of the Judgment of the Apex Court in the case
of GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. V/. Income-Tax
GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. V/. Income-Tax
Officer & others
Officer & others reported in 2003 (259) I.T.R.19
objecting to the reopening of the assessment; but no
such objections appear to have been filed by the
petitioner.
3. Since no objections were raised and there was
-= : 2 : =-
no occasion for the assessing officer to decide the
same. In view of the Apex Court Judgment cited supra;
it would be in the fitness of things, to permit the
petitioner to raise objections, if any, within 2 weeks
from today to the reopening of the assessment.
4. In the event of such objections, being raised
by the petitioner, it would be open for the
respondents to decide the same in accordance with law
following the principles of natural justice by a
reasoned order. Needless to mention that all rival
contentions are kept open.
5. In the event, determination of the objection
adverse to the petitioner, it shall operate against
the petitioner after expiry of 2 weeks from the date
of communication of the said order; till then no
assessment proceedings shall proceed.
6. In the above view of the matter, we dispose
of this petition in terms of this order keeping all
rival contentions open. No order as to costs.
Parties to act on ordinary copy of this order
duly authenticated by the P.A.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
-= : 3 : =-
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.