Case LawHigh Court › Wp/44497/2011 Of Ge India Technology Cen...

Wp/44497/2011 Of Ge India Technology Centre Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 22 Sep 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/44497/2011 Of Ge India Technology Centre Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
22 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/44497/2011 Of Ge India Technology Centre Pvt Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Tne writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms| stated above.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

WP.No.44497/2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THILS THE 2 DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014 BEFORE. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH #WRIT PETITION No.44497/2011 (TIT) BETWEEN: GE INDIA TECHNOLOGY CENTRE PVT. LTD.HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT122, EPIP, WHITEFIELD ROADHOOD! VILLAGE, WHITEFIELDBANGALORE - 560 066.REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER .. PETLTIONER| (BY SRI PAWAN SHARMA FORSRI T.S. AMAR KUMAR, ADVOCATES) AND: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11 (3)! FLOOR, R.P.BRAWANNRUPATHUNGA ROADBANGALORE - 560 OOL1 ... RESPONDENT| (BY SRI E.R.INDRAKUMAR, SR. COUNSEL FOR |SRI E.ILSANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &|22/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO RESTRAIN|THE RESPONDENT, HIS SERVANTS AND AGENTS FROM ACTING.PURSUANT TO SECTION 147 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961, IN.CASES WHERE THE ASSESSMENT IS SOUGHT TO BE REOPENED|BASED ON A MERE CHANGE OF OPINION BY THE ASSESSING|OFFICER AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS)DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: WP.No.44497/2011 ORDER H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral): L.Sri Pawan Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the|petitioner seeks leave to witndraw the writ petition witnliberty to the petitioner to file objections to the reasonsfurnishedTO thepetitionerIn.thecommunication |dtd. 21 November 2011 (Annexure-B) within two weeks|from today. 2.SrE.R.Indrakumar,learned.SeniorCounsel]appearing for the respondent submits that he has noobjection for grant of liberty as sougnt for. Accordingly,liberty to the petitioner as sought for is granted. 3.Learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondentfairly submits that the respondent will consider theopjections tnat will be filed by the petitioner, in accordancewith law, and pass an appropriate order on tne objections.He furtner submits that after adjudication of the objectionsfiled by the petitioner, if the respondent is required toproceed further in the matter, he will not hurriedly proceed -3- WP.No.44497/2011 to pass any further order before expiry of two weeks. His Submission is placed on record. Tne writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in terms| stated above. BNS Sd/-. JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan