Case LawHigh Court › Wp/4498/2018 Of Mr. Mohammed Iftekharudd...

Wp/4498/2018 Of Mr. Mohammed Iftekharuddin v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 12 Feb 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/4498/2018 Of Mr. Mohammed Iftekharuddin v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
12 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/4498/2018 Of Mr. Mohammed Iftekharuddin v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The writ petition is accordingly dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the appropriate statutory remedy in accordance with law.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO WRIT PETITION No.4498 OF 2018 ORDER:(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) The petitioner challenges the assessment order dated 29.12.2017 of the Income Tax Officer, Ward-10(1), Hyderabad, passed under Section 143 (3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act of 1961’), in relation to the Assessment Year 2006-07. This order of assessment is appealable under Section 146 of the Act of 1961. Sri P. Girish Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, would state that the relief sought by the petitioner is by way of reading down of a statutory provision, namely, Section 50C of the Act of 1961, and that is the reason why, he has approached this Court by way of this writ petition. We are not inclined to entertain this writ petition. When a hierarchy of statutory remedies are made available to a person aggrieved by the assessment madeby the Income Tax Authorities, entertainment of a writ petition, if at all, would be on very limited grounds. No such grounds are made out in the present writ petition warranting deviation from the usual rule that the appeal remedy should be taken recourse to in the first instance. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed leaving it open to the petitioner to avail the appropriate statutory remedy in accordance with law. It is open to the petitioner to raise all contentions which find mention in this writ petition before the said appellate authority. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs. Date: 12.02.2018 va ____________________ JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR ______________________ JUSTICE P.KESHAVA RAO
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan