Case LawHigh Court › Wp/4517/2015 Of M/S A.p. Beverages Corpo...

Wp/4517/2015 Of M/S A.p. Beverages Corporation Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I

High Court 26 Feb 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/4517/2015 Of M/S A.p. Beverages Corporation Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I
Date of order
26 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/4517/2015 Of M/S A.p. Beverages Corporation Limited v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-I, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.4517 of 2015 DATED:26.02.2015 Between:M/s. A.P. Beverage Corporation Limited,Hyderabad. And … Petitioner The Commissioner of Income Tax-I,Hyderabad and others. ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.4517 of 2015 Order:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) The writ petition is thoroughly mis-conceived as we do notfind any reason to entertain this matter. The fact remains that the Assessing Officer has alreadypassed the assessment order under the Income Tax Act, 1961quantifying a sum of Rs.1468,63,95,620/- and this order ofassessment still remains unchallenged. As a result, recoveryproceedings have been initiated by attaching the bank account ofthe petitioner. We do not find any illegality and infirmity in the action atpresent. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed. However, liberty is given to the petitioner to approach theappropriate forum. This order of dismissal will not prevent andprejudice the petitioner from approaching the appropriateauthority. Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications shallalso stand closed. No order as to costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 26[th] February, 2015 Pnb
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan