Wp/45334/2002 Of T.m.b. Ameer Ali v. The Income-Tax Appellate
High Court
20 Jan 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/45334/2002 Of T.m.b. Ameer Ali v. The Income-Tax Appellate
Date of order
20 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/45334/2002 Of T.m.b. Ameer Ali v. The Income-Tax Appellate, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
CORAM
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARIANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.SARAVANAN
The Income Tax Appellate TribunalRajaji Bhavan, Besant NagarChennai 600 090....Respondent in both W.Ps.For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondent : Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan, Senior Standing Counsel
Prayer : Writ Petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia praying for the issuance of a Writ of CertiorarifiedMandamus to call for the records relating to the petitioner onthe file of the respondent herein and quash the impugned orderinM.P.No.84/Mds/2001andM.P.No.60/Mds/2001inI.T.A.No.2419/Mds/94 and I.T.A.No.2418/Mds/94 respectively,dated 28.09.2001 and consequently direct the respondent torehear the case after considering the evidence on record.
When the matter was listed on 06.01.2020, there was noappearance on behalf of the petitioner Assessee and hence thematter was posted today for hearing.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
2. Today also, none present for the petitioner andtherefore, the writ petitions are dismissed for want ofprosecution. A copy of the order may be sent to thepetitioner Assessee. No costs.
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar
//True Copy//
Sub Assistant Registrar
KST
To1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Rajaji Bhavan, Besant Nagar Chennai 600 090.2.T.M.B.Ameer Ali No.109, Uthamar Gandhi Salai, Chennai-600 034.+1cc to M/s.Hema Murali Krishnan, Advocate SR.3464W.P.Nos.45334 & 45335 of 2002VBA(CO)CB(19/02/2020)
2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.