Wp/4543/2022 Of Akshar Properties Mumbai v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 27(1) And Ors
High Court
13 Apr 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/4543/2022 Of Akshar Properties Mumbai v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 27(1) And Ors
Date of order
13 Apr 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/4543/2022 Of Akshar Properties Mumbai v. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle 27(1) And Ors, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Decision: 911-cwp-4543-22.doc 3]Since we have set aside the notice itself, the assessment orderdated 29.03.2022, copy whereof is annexed to the petition at Exhibit-E,cannot be sustained.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
911-cwp-4543-22.doc
Digitally signedby DINESHDINESHSADANAND IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYSHERLASADANANDSHERLADate:2022.04.18 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION 17:39:41+0500 WRIT PETITION NO. 4543 OF 2022
Akshar PropertiesV/s.Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 27(1), Mumbai and anr.
… Petitioner
… Respondents
----------------
Ms Ritika Agarwal i/b ACE Legal for the Petitioner.Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Respondent.
----------------
P.C.
CORAM :
K.R. SHRIRAM &N.R. BORKAR, JJ.:APRIL 13, 2022.
DATE
1]In this case the notice issued under Section 148 of the Income
Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) is dated 06.05.2021 but the procedure followed
is the old procedure which came to be replaced by the Finance Act,2021 with effect from 01.04.2021.
2]We have already held in Tata Communications Transformation
Services Limited V/s. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax 14(1) &Ors.1that such notices are bad in law and have to be quashed.Accordingly, notice impugned in this petition is hereby quashed and setaside.
1. Writ Petition No.1334 of 2021 dated 29[th] March, 2022.
911-cwp-4543-22.doc
3]Since we have set aside the notice itself, the assessment orderdated 29.03.2022, copy whereof is annexed to the petition at Exhibit-E,cannot be sustained. Same is also quashed and set aside. Anyconsequential orders or steps taken will also stand quashed.
4]Petition disposed accordingly.
(N.R. BORKAR, J.)
(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.