Wp/461/2014 Of Shri R Ramesh v. Director Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1 DAY OF APRIL, 2015. BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.461/2014(T-RES) BETWEEN: 1LSHRI.R.RAME SHAGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,9/O.LATE T.D.RAMACHANDRA RAO,THE M.D., OF M/s.R.R.GOLD PALACE PVT.LTD.,R/AT:NO.98, SATYANARAYANA LAYOUT,Ill STAGE, IV-BLOCK,BASAVESHWARNAGARA, BENGALURU-560079. 2.M/s.R.R.GOLD PALACE PVT. LTD.,COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE |COMPANIES ACT,19956,BBING RBPRESEBENTBD BY ITS M.DSHRI.R.RAMESH,HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT |1ST FLOOR,HIMAGIRE APARTMENTS,LOoTH CROSS, 4TH MAIN ROAD,MALLESWARAM,BBRNGALURU-560003. PRTITIONERS| (BY SRI.KIRAN KUMAR K., ADVOCATE) 2 AND: 1.DIRBCTOR OF INCOMB TAX(INV.),CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,NO.1, QULBENS ROAD, BENGALURU-56000 1. 2DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCENTRAL CIRCEL 1(2), BENGALURU, CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,NO.1, QUEENS ROAD, |BBNGALURU-560001. 3.DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX(INV.)UNIT-II(3), CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,NO.1, QUEENS ROAD,BBNGALURU-560001. 4.ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR OF INCOME-TAX(INV.),UNIT-I], CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,NO.1, QUEENS ROAD,BBNGALURU-560001. o.INCOME-TAX OFFICER(INV.), UNIT-I], CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,NO.1, QUEENS ROAD, |BBRNGALURU-560001. RESPONDENTS (BY SRIL.K.V.ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) ‘THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226.& 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO: 1]|JDECLARE THAT THE SEIZURE OF ITEMS/JEWELS [MADOUT OF PRECIOUS METAL AND/OR PRECIOUS STONE,| WHICH WERRE SKBIZBED VIDB THR 'INVENTORY OF TJEWELLERY SEIZED’ DTD.09.02.2013, BEARING ANNEX-"RRGP/R', PAGE ONE, VIDE ANNEXURE-D AS ILLEGAL ANDWITHOUT THERE AUTHORITY OF THE LAW 2|DECLARE THAT THE SEIZURE OF ITEMS/JEWELS|MADE|OUT OF PRECIOUS METAL AND/OR PRECIOUS STONE,|WHICH WERE SBIZED VIDE THRE ‘INVENTORY OF THEJEWELLERY SEIZED' BEARING ANNEXURE-CS/RRGP/R,PAGE-1, DTD.06.04.13 VIDE ANNEXURE-K IS ILLEGAL ANDWITHOUT THR AUTHORITY OF THE LAW.| 3/QUASHTHE."WARRANT.OF|AUTHORISATION'DTD.07.02.9013 ISSUBD AS AGAINST THR PETITIONER.NO.2 BY THE R-1 |COPY OF THE ABOVE MENTIONED"WARRANT OF AUTHORISATION' [S NOT SBRVEBED ON THPETITIONERS]. ETC. THIS WRIT PRTITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY|HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER| Memo is filed by learned counsel for petitioners seeking permission of the court to withdraw the above writ petition. Memo is placed on record. Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. SBN | Sd/- | JUDGE