Wp/4612/2013 Of K.v.v.prasad v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
04 Feb 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
Wp/4612/2013 Of K.v.v.prasad v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
04 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/4612/2013 Of K.v.v.prasad v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
APHC010401782013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3516]
TUESDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHANTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
WRIT PETITION NO: 4612/2013
Between:
K.v.v.prasad,
...PETITIONER
AND
Income Tax Officer and Others
...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.VEDULA SRINIVAS
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI
2.S R ASHOK
3.K B RAMANNA DORA
The Court made the following:
ORDER: (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. Krishna Mohan)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this writ petition.
2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________
JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY
04.02.2025 PGT
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue