Wp/4620/2020 Of Rajendra Vipdan Sahkari Samiti v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
03 Mar 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp/4620/2020 Of Rajendra Vipdan Sahkari Samiti v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/4620/2020 Of Rajendra Vipdan Sahkari Samiti v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
The High Court Of Madhya PradeshWP-4620-2020
(RAJENDRA VIPDAN SAHKARI SAMITIVs INCOME TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS)
[03][-][03][-][2020]Jabalpur, Dated :
Shri Sanjay Mishra and Shri Gaurav Tiwari, Advocates for the
petitioner.
Shri Sanjay Lal, learned counsel for the respondent Nos.1 and 2.
This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of
India seeking following reliefs :-
(i) That the Hon'ble Court be pleased to call forthe entire record of the matter relating toassessment made by the respondent No.1 forassessment year 2017-18.
(ii) That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to directthe respondent No.2 to decide the application forstay filed by the petitioner Annexure P-10.
(iii) That, the Hon'ble Court be pleased to directthe respondent No.2 to decide the appeal filed bythe respondent No.2 to decide the appeal filed by
the petitioner as early as possible.
(iv) That, the Hon'ble Court may please to grantany other suitable relief.
After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed
that he may be allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to takerecourse to alternate remedies as may be available, in accordance with law.
Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. It shall be opento the petitioner to take recourse to the remedies as are available, inaccordance with law.
(AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)CHIEF JUSTICE
(VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA)JUDGE
PK
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.