Case Law › High Court › Wp/4723/2007 Of Sri Swami Hathiramji Mut...

Wp/4723/2007 Of Sri Swami Hathiramji Mutt, Tirumala Tirupathi v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ayakar

High Court 08 Mar 2007 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

08 Mar 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/4723/2007 Of Sri Swami Hathiramji Mutt, Tirumala Tirupathi v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Ayakar, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE BILAL NAZKIANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAOWRIT PETITION No.4723 of 2007DATED 08-03-2007 Between:Sri Swami Hathiramji Mutt,Tirumala Tirupathi, Chittoor District.And1.The Commissioner of Income Tax,Ayakar Bhavan, Bashirbagh,Hyderabad and another. …Petitioner …Respondents The Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal NazkiandThe Hon’ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao WRIT PETITION No.4723 of 2007 Order:(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice Bilal Nazki): After arguing for fairly some time, Sri S.Ramachandra Rao, the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner seekspermission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition.Permission is accorded.The Writ Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.___________________________ (Bilal Nazki, J)Dated 8[th] March, 2007____________________________ (Nooty Ramamohana Rao, J)lur

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.