Case LawHigh Court › Wp/4740/2014 Of Amarsingh v. Commissione...

Wp/4740/2014 Of Amarsingh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur And Others

High Court 05 Sep 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Wp/4740/2014 Of Amarsingh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur And Others
Date of order
05 Sep 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/4740/2014 Of Amarsingh v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur And Others, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

wp4740.14 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.4740 OF 2014Amarsingh Harishchandra Waghmare -vs- Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur and others ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Office notes, Office Memoranda ofCoram, appearances, Court's ordersor directions and Registrar's orders. Court's or Judge's Orders. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Mr.M.M.Sudame, counsel for the petitioner.Mr.Anand Parchure, counsel for the respondents. CORAM : SMT. VASANTI A. NAIK & P. R. BORA, JJ.DATE : 05.09.2014. Shri Sudame, the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the petitioner gives up the prayers made in the petition and the grievance of the petitioner would stand redressed, if this Court directs the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner within a time frame. Shri Parchure, the learned counsel for the respondents, states that the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur would decide the appeal as early as possible. In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur to decide the appeal filed by the petitioner as early as possible and within a period of six months. The petitioner undertakes to appear before the Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeal)-I, Nagpur on 22[nd] of September, 2014 so that issuance of notice to the petitioner could be dispensed with. No costs. JUDGE JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan