Wp/4755/2021 Of M/S B P L Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1
High Court
08 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/4755/2021 Of M/S B P L Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1
Date of order
08 Jul 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/4755/2021 Of M/S B P L Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8 DAY OF JULY, 2022
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.I.ARUN
-WRIT PETITION NO.4755 OF 2021(TIT)
BETWEEN
M/S B.P.L.LTD., 11 KM, BANNERGHATTA ROAD, AREKERE, BENGALURU. (REPRESENTED BY SHRI.DINESH M SHENOY)
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI DANESH HOMYAR GARDIN., ADVOCATE)
AND
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-1, BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095. BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1)(4), BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGLAURU – 560 095. BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGLAURU – 560 095.
3.THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGLAURU – 560 095. INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1)(2), BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGLAURU – 560 095.
4.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001. CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING, QUEEN’S ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE LETTER OF THE R-3 DATED 18.12.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15(ANNEXURE-B) AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In spite of granting sufficient time, the petitioner has not complied with office objections. Today, nobody appears for the petitioner. It appears the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition.
Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue