Wp/4901/2025 Of Sri. Nataraju Nelamane Visweshragowda v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
20 Mar 2025 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/4901/2025 Of Sri. Nataraju Nelamane Visweshragowda v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
20 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
2022-23
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/4901/2025 Of Sri. Nataraju Nelamane Visweshragowda v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, I pass the following: ORDER (i) The petition is hereby allowed and remanded.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byKAVYA RLocation:High Court ofKarnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 4901 OF 2025 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
SRI.NATARAJU NELAMANE VISWESHARAGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O NATARAJU, NELAMANE VILLAGE, S.R.PATNA TALUK, MANDYA - 571 435. PAN: .
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. RAVI SHANKAR S V., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1 & TPS, MANDYA - 571 401. WARD 1 & TPS, MANDYA - 571 401.
2. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE, ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI - 110 003. ADDITIONAL/JOINT/DEPUTY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ INCOME TAX OFFICER, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, ROOM NO.401, 2 FLOOR, E-RAMP, JAWAHARLAL NEHRU STADIUM, DELHI - 110 003.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M.THIRUMALESH, ADVOCATE)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 144 R.W.S 144B DATED 15.02.2024 BEARING DIN NO.ITBA/AST/S/144/2023-24/1061048915(1) ISSUED
BY THE R-2 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2022-23 HEREIN MARKED AS ANNEXURE - A AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
(i) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the order passed Under section 144 r.w.s 144B dated 15/02/2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/144/2023-24/1061048915(1) issued by the Respondent No. 2 for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A. writ of certiorari quashing the order passed Under section 144 r.w.s 144B dated 15/02/2024 bearing DIN No.ITBA/AST/S/144/2023-24/1061048915(1) issued by the Respondent No. 2 for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A.
(ii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271AAC(1) of the Act dated 01/08/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271AAC(1)/2024-25/1067220683(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A1. writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 271AAC(1) of the Act dated 01/08/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/271AAC(1)/2024-25/1067220683(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A1.
(iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Act dated 01/08/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024-25/1067218091(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Act dated 01/08/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024-25/1067218091(1), issued by the Respondent No.2
for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A2.
(iv) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity. deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
(iii) Issue a writ of Certiorari or direction in the nature of a writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Act dated 01/08/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024-25/1067218091(1), issued by the Respondent No.2 writ of certiorari quashing the penalty order under Section 272A(1)(d) of the Act dated 01/08/2024 bearing DIN No. ITBA/PNL/F/272A(1)(d)/2024-25/1067218091(1), issued by the Respondent No.2
for the assessment year 2022-23 herein marked as Annexure - A2.
(iv) And pass such other orders as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity. deems fit and proper in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.
3. In addition to reiterating the various contentions urged in the memorandum of petition and referring to the material on record, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that notice issued by the respondents under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short, ‘IT Act’), was not received by petitioner and he was not aware of the notice and consequently, petitioner could not submit its reply / response along with documents to the said notice. It is submitted that the inability and omission on the part of the petitioner to submit reply / response along with documents to the Section 143(2) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and as such, if one more opportunity is provided to the petitioner to do so by setting aside the impugned orders and notices, the petitioner would do so and
respondents may be directed to proceed further in accordance with law.
4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondents submits that there is no merit in the petition and that the same is liable to be dismissed.
5. A perusal of the impugned order will indicate that it is an undisputed fact that petitioner has not submitted reply / response along with documents to Section 143(2) notice. Under these circumstances, in view of the specific assertion on the part of the petitioner that his inability and omission to submit a reply along with documents to Section 143(2) notice was due to bonafide reasons, unavoidable circumstances and sufficient cause and if one more opportunity is granted, petitioner would submit reply along with documents, I deem it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned orders at Annexure–A dated 15.02.2024 passed under Section 144 read with Section 144B of Income Tax Act; Annexures-A1 and A2 dated 01.08.2024 passed under Sections 271AAC(1) and 272A(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act and subsequent notice / orders, etc., and remit the matter back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh from the stage of submitting of reply by
the petitioner to Section 143(2) notice and to proceed further in
accordance with law.
6. In the result, I pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The petition is hereby allowed and remanded.
(ii) Impugned order/penalty orders at Annexure–A dated 15.02.2024, Annexures-A1 and A2 dated 01.08.2024 are hereby set aside.dated 15.02.2024, Annexures-A1 and A2 dated 01.08.2024 are hereby set aside.
(iii) Matter is remitted back to respondent No.1 for reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. reconsideration afresh in accordance with law from the stage of submitting of reply to the Show Cause Notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act.
(iv) Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to submit additional pleadings, documents, etc., to the concerned respondent, who shall consider the same and proceed further in accordance with law. submit additional pleadings, documents, etc., to the concerned respondent, who shall consider the same and proceed further in accordance with law.
Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.