Case LawHigh Court › Wp/4986/2020 Of M/S B P L Ltd v. The Com...

Wp/4986/2020 Of M/S B P L Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

High Court 16 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/4986/2020 Of M/S B P L Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
16 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
2014-15
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/4986/2020 Of M/S B P L Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 16[TH|]DAY OF FEBRUARY 202)BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV|%WRIT PETITION No.4986/2020 (TIT) BETWEEN: M/S. B.P.L. LTD.,.11 KM,|BANNERGHATTA ROAD|AREKERE.BENGALURUREP. BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORYSRI DINESH M. SHENOY._ PETITIONER (BY SRI A. MAHESH CHOWDHARY, ADVOCATE FORSRI DANESH H. GARDIN, ADVOCATE) 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) -1,BMTC BUILDING, |KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 O95.BMTC BUILDING, |KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 O95. 2D.THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CIRCLE - 11(2),BMTC BUILDING,KORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 095.CIRCLE - 11(2),BMTC BUILDING,KORAMANGALABENGALURU - 560 095. 3.THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 1(1)(2),. BMTC BUILDING, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU - 560 O95. 4THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,QUEENS ROAD,QUEENS ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 OO1.RESPONDENTS (BY SRI E.I. SANMATHI, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &22/7 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE R-1TO DISPOSE OF THE APPEAL FILED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR.AOLL-LZ VIDE ANNEXURE-E WITHIN WEEKS AND ETC, THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of.mandamus to dispose off the appeal filed for theAssessment year 2011-12 vide Annexure- E. 2. The petitioner has also sought for directions to.restrain the second and fourth respondent from enforcingdemand for the assessment year 2014-15 and the for theassessment year 2017-18 as per Annexure-'F and ‘Grespectively. | 3. The learned counsel for respondent submits that in lignt of assessment proceedings are now required to be disposed off under the “Faceless Assessment Scneme_, thematter would be taken up and disposed off expeditiously. 4. In lignt of such undertaking, no further orders are|required to be passed. However, insofar as the request forstay of demand is concerned, it is always open for thepetitioner to move tne appropriate authority includingmaking request for interim prayer which request if madewould be taken up and disposed off expeditiously as perlaw. | 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off. Sd/-. JUDGE| Np/-|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan