Wp/5023/2021 Of Smt Sangeet Agrawal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1
High Court
09 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Wp/5023/2021 Of Smt Sangeet Agrawal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1
Date of order
09 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/5023/2021 Of Smt Sangeet Agrawal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: VEENA MANDLIK - ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER At request of petitioner's counsel, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANSOUMYA RANJANDALAIDate: 2022.12.0917:51:41 IST
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE
BEFOREHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 9[th] OF DECEMBER, 2022WRIT PETITION No. 5023 of 2021
BETWEEN:-
SMT SANGEET AGRAWAL W/O SHRI SUNIL AGRAWAL,AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: TEACHER 198,GUMASTA NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH)
.....PETITIONER
(BY SHRI ASHISH GOYAL - ADVOCATE)
ANDPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 AYKARBHAWAN, WHITE CHURCH ROAD, INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH)
.....RESPONDENT
(MS. VEENA MANDLIK - ADVOCATE)
This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice
Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following:
ORDER
At request of petitioner's counsel, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(RAVI MALIMATH)(PRANAY VERMA)CHIEF JUSTICEJUDGE
soumya
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.