Case LawHigh Court › Wp/5023/2021 Of Smt Sangeet Agrawal v. P...

Wp/5023/2021 Of Smt Sangeet Agrawal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1

High Court 09 Dec 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_ind
Parties
Wp/5023/2021 Of Smt Sangeet Agrawal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1
Date of order
09 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/5023/2021 Of Smt Sangeet Agrawal v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: VEENA MANDLIK - ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER At request of petitioner's counsel, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Signature Not VerifiedDigitally signed bySANSOUMYA RANJANDALAIDate: 2022.12.0917:51:41 IST 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT INDORE BEFOREHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH,CHIEF JUSTICE & HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE PRANAY VERMAON THE 9[th] OF DECEMBER, 2022WRIT PETITION No. 5023 of 2021 BETWEEN:- SMT SANGEET AGRAWAL W/O SHRI SUNIL AGRAWAL,AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCCUPATION: TEACHER 198,GUMASTA NAGAR (MADHYA PRADESH) .....PETITIONER (BY SHRI ASHISH GOYAL - ADVOCATE) ANDPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 AYKARBHAWAN, WHITE CHURCH ROAD, INDORE (MADHYAPRADESH) .....RESPONDENT (MS. VEENA MANDLIK - ADVOCATE) This petition coming on for admission this day, Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravi Malimath, Chief Justice passed the following: ORDER At request of petitioner's counsel, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (RAVI MALIMATH)(PRANAY VERMA)CHIEF JUSTICEJUDGE soumya
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan