Case LawHigh Court › Wp/5032/2017 Of M.karthikeyan v. The Inc...

Wp/5032/2017 Of M.karthikeyan v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 03 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Wp/5032/2017 Of M.karthikeyan v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
03 Jul 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/5032/2017 Of M.karthikeyan v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, the writ petition is dismissed fornon-prosecution and the order of interim stay is vacated and thepetition in W.M.P.No.5318 of 2017 stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 03.07.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAMW.P.No.5032 of 2017andW.M.P.No.5318 of 2017M.Karthikeyan.. Petitioner VsThe Income-tax Officer,Ward 1(3), Tirupur. .. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for therecords in order giving effect to order of U/s 155 r.w.s.143(3)dated 27.12.2016 on the file of the respondent and quash thesame. For Petitioner : No appearanceFor Respondent : Mr.A.P.Srinivas, Senior Standing Counsel, Income-tax DepartmentORDER Record of the proceedings show that an order of interimstay was granted by this Court on 01.03.2017 directing thepetitioner to deposit a sum of Rs.14,00,000/- (Rupees FourteenLakhs Only) within a time frame. 2.The learned standing counsel for the respondent submittedthat the conditional order has not been complied with. When thecase came up on 14.06.2017, time was sought for, to produce theproof of payment of the said sum of Rs.14,00,000/-. In the lasthearing, no such proof was produced. The learned StandingCounsel appearing for the respondent Department submitted thatin the last hearing, there was no representation on behalf ofthe petitioner. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed fornon-prosecution and the order of interim stay is vacated and thepetition in W.M.P.No.5318 of 2017 stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar KMToThe Income-tax Officer,Ward 1(3), Tirupur. +1cc to M/s.A.P.Srinivasan, Advocate SR.No.46770W.P.No.5032 of 2017andW.M.P.No.5318 of 2017PPA(CO)GN(11/07/2017)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan