Wp/506/2011 Of Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 10(3)(4) And 4 Ors
High Court
21 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/506/2011 Of Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 10(3)(4) And 4 Ors
Date of order
21 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/506/2011 Of Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 10(3)(4) And 4 Ors, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.
Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the impugned order dated 21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 is directed to hear the application of the Petitioner dated 21[st] February 2011 in accordance with law.21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 i...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
PGK
Writ Petition No.506 of 2011
Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt.Ltd.... Petitioner
v/s.
Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax10(3)(4) & ors.... Respondents
Mr.J.D. Mistry i/by Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for Petitioner.Mr.Suresh Kumar for Respondents.-----
SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ.
DATED :21st March 2011
P.C.:
1.The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21[st ]February 2011 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, whereby the Petitioner is directed to pay at-least 40% of the outstanding demand relating to the Assessment Year 2007-08.
2.In the present case, the Petitioner has made an application seeking stay of demand before the C.I.T., City-10 on 21[st] of February 2011 and the same was disposed off on the same day, without hearing the Petitioner. Counsel for the Revenue states that the application dated 21[st] February 2011 would be heard by
the C.I.T. afresh and an order would be passed after hearing the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from today.
3.In this view of the matter, the impugned order dated 21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 is directed to hear the application of the Petitioner dated 21[st] February 2011 in accordance with law.21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 is directed to hear the application of the Petitioner dated 21[st] February 2011 in accordance with law.
4.The Respondent shall not take coercive steps till the disposal of the Application dated 21[st] of February 2011 and for a further period of two weeks thereafter, if the order of the CIT is adverse to the Petitioner.disposal of the Application dated 21[st] of February 2011 and for a further period of two weeks thereafter, if the order of the CIT is adverse to the Petitioner.
5.Petition is disposed off accordingly.
(ROSHAN DALVI, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.