Case LawHigh Court › Wp/506/2011 Of Zydus Nycomed Healthcare...

Wp/506/2011 Of Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 10(3)(4) And 4 Ors

High Court 21 Mar 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/506/2011 Of Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 10(3)(4) And 4 Ors
Date of order
21 Mar 2011
Assessment year(s)
2007-08
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/506/2011 Of Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt. Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax 10(3)(4) And 4 Ors, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Decision: 3.In this view of the matter, the impugned order dated 21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 is directed to hear the application of the Petitioner dated 21[st] February 2011 in accordance with law.21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 i...

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PGK Writ Petition No.506 of 2011 Zydus Nycomed Healthcare Pvt.Ltd.... Petitioner v/s. Asst. Commissioner of Income-tax10(3)(4) & ors.... Respondents Mr.J.D. Mistry i/by Mr.B.V. Jhaveri for Petitioner.Mr.Suresh Kumar for Respondents.----- SMT.ROSHAN DALVI, JJ. DATED :21st March 2011 P.C.: 1.The Petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 21[st ]February 2011 passed by the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai, whereby the Petitioner is directed to pay at-least 40% of the outstanding demand relating to the Assessment Year 2007-08. 2.In the present case, the Petitioner has made an application seeking stay of demand before the C.I.T., City-10 on 21[st] of February 2011 and the same was disposed off on the same day, without hearing the Petitioner. Counsel for the Revenue states that the application dated 21[st] February 2011 would be heard by the C.I.T. afresh and an order would be passed after hearing the Petitioner within a period of two weeks from today. 3.In this view of the matter, the impugned order dated 21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 is directed to hear the application of the Petitioner dated 21[st] February 2011 in accordance with law.21[st] February 2011 is quashed and set aside and the C.I.T., City-10 is directed to hear the application of the Petitioner dated 21[st] February 2011 in accordance with law. 4.The Respondent shall not take coercive steps till the disposal of the Application dated 21[st] of February 2011 and for a further period of two weeks thereafter, if the order of the CIT is adverse to the Petitioner.disposal of the Application dated 21[st] of February 2011 and for a further period of two weeks thereafter, if the order of the CIT is adverse to the Petitioner. 5.Petition is disposed off accordingly. (ROSHAN DALVI, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR,J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan