Wp/5062/2025 Of Basanthlal Sah v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
High Court
21 Feb 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/5062/2025 Of Basanthlal Sah v. Income Tax Officer, Ward
Date of order
21 Feb 2025
Assessment year(s)
2021-22
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/5062/2025 Of Basanthlal Sah v. Income Tax Officer, Ward, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAULANDTHE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE RENUKA YARA
WRIT PETITION NO: 5062 OF 2025
Between:
Basanthlal Sah, S/o. Sri Bijay Lal Sah, aged about 48 years, Plot No. 7, D.No. 33-B to 33-1 1, IDA Jeedimetla, Subash Nagar, IDA-Jeedimetla 500055,Telangana, lndia
..,PETITIONER
AND
1lncome Tax Officer, Ward, ['1 ]1 (4), Signature Towers, Sy. No. 6(P) ofKondapur, Sy. No. 37(P) of Kothaguda, Opp Botanical Gardens,Serilingampally (M), R.R. District, Hyderabad, Telangana 500084Kondapur, Sy. No. 37(P) of Kothaguda, Opp Botanical Gardens,Serilingampally (M), R.R. District, Hyderabad, Telangana 500084
2Assessment Unit, lncome Tax Department, tvlinistry of Finance, Governmentof lndia, New Delhi.of lndia, New Delhi.
3Commissioner of lncome Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre,Delhi.Delhi.
4AXIS Bank Ltd., CBB Hyderabad, Rep. by its Branch Manager, D.No.6-3-879/8, Green Lands, Begumpet, Hyderabad-s00O16.879/8, Green Lands, Begumpet, Hyderabad-s00O16.
5. AXIS Bank Ltd., Suchitra TG, Rep. by its Branch lvlanaoer, VennelagaddaSuchitra 'X'Road, Opp. lndian Oil Bunk, Hyderabad-50005Suchitra 'X'Road, Opp. lndian Oil Bunk, Hyderabad-50005
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to
(i)issue a writ, direction or order more particularly in the nature of a writof mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.1 in attaching thebank accounts of the Petitioner bearing Nos. 91 9030013476236,91802A099522739, 918020098519833 and 920030051296685of mandamus declaring the action of Respondent No.1 in attaching thebank accounts of the Petitioner bearing Nos. 91 9030013476236,91802A099522739, 918020098519833 and 920030051296685
maintained with Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 vide notice dated 29-01-2025 bearing DIN No. ITBA/COIM/F/1712024-2511072666922(1) uts.226(3) of the lncome Tax Act, 1961 for recovery of the dues pertainingto the Assessment Year 2021-22 during the pendency of the appealsand stay application before Respondent No.3 as being illegal,arbitrary, without authority of law, violative of Article 1a and 19(1Xg) of. [the ][Constitution ][of ][lndia and violative ][of ][provisions ][of ][lncome Tax ][Act,]1961 and, consequently, direct Respondent No.1 to unfreeze the bankaccounts listed out in impugned notice forthwith
(ii)
Direct Respondent No.3 to dispose of stay petition and appeal within a
reasonable time as deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
lA NO: 1 OF 2025
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstanges statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the operation of Garnishee Notice dated 29-01-2025 bearing DIN No.ITBA/COM/F/1712024-2511072666922(1)attaching the bank accounts of thePetitioner bearing Nos. 919030013476236, 918020099522739,918020098519833 and 920030051296685 for recovery of alleged dues for theAY.2021-22.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.V.RAGHU RAM
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: M/s. B.SAPNA REDDY,
Jr. SC FOR INCOME TAX
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE ANDTHE HON'BLE SMT.
IVRIT PETITION No.5O62 of 2025
ORDER [(Per ][tlrc ][Hon'ble ][the ][Acting ][Chief ][Justice ][Suiog Paul):]
Heard Sri A.V. Raghu Ram, learned counsel for [the]petitioner and [Ms. ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddy, ][learned ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel [for ][Income Tax ][Department, for respondent ][Nos. ][1 ][to ][3.]
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI A.V.RAGHU RAM
Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: M/s. B.SAPNA REDDY,
Jr. SC FOR INCOME TAX
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON,BLE ANDTHE HON'BLE SMT.
IVRIT PETITION No.5O62 of 2025
ORDER [(Per ][tlrc ][Hon'ble ][the ][Acting ][Chief ][Justice ][Suiog Paul):]
Heard Sri A.V. Raghu Ram, learned counsel for [the]petitioner and [Ms. ][B. ][Sapna ][Reddy, ][learned ][Junior ][Standing]Counsel [for ][Income Tax ][Department, for respondent ][Nos. ][1 ][to ][3.]
2. The singular [grievance ][put ]forth by the [petitioner ]is [that]the [Assessment ][Order dated ][23.12.2022, ][the ][petitioner]against an [appeal, ][along ][with ][a stay ][application, ][which ][is ][pending]preferred consideration [before ][respondent ][No.3. ][The said ][appeal ][and ][stay]application [were preferred ][on ][20.01.2023 ][but ][till ][date, ][no ][orders]have been [passed ][on the ][said stay ][application. ][On ][the ][other ][hand,]respondent No.i [is ][proceeding ][against ][the ][petitioner ][and ][his ][bank]account has been [attached ][on ][29.01.2025 ][(Annexure-P ][1).]
3. The singular [prayer ]advanced is that till the [petitioner's]stay application [is ][decided, he may be ][permitted ][to ][operate ][his ][bank]account.
4. Learned Junior Standing Counsel for [Income ][Tax]Department, for [respondent ][Nos. ][1 ][to 3, ][submits ][that ][three ][weeks]time may be granted to decide [the ][stay ][application ][and ][the]
I
I
\
operation of bank accounts of the petitioner be made subject tofinal outcome of the stay application.final outcome of the stay application.
5. In view of aforesaid stand taken by learned counsel for theparties, we deem it proper to dispose of this petition by directingrespondent No.3 to decide the stay application of the petitionerwithin 15 days from today. The outcome of the stay application willdecide about the permission to operate the bank account by thepetitioner.
6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs
7. Learned Junior Standing Counsel for Income TaxDepartment, for respondent Nos. I to 3 is requested to communicatethis order to the concerned authorit5z within 24 hours.
Interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall also standclosed.
SD/. P. PADMANABHAEDDYASSISTANT STRAR//TRUE COPY//SECTIOFFICER
To,1The lncome [Tax ][officer. ][Ward, ][1 ][1 (4)' ][Signature ][Towers, ][Sy. ][No. 6(P) ][of]h r r, ff #l.,,i x ;i il.' [d ][:l ]e: i:i*ii.i", Bahlz' I . ::l: : : :2.The Assessment [un(' ][rittirn'" ]"l',,i:* ['ial-bepartmeit' ][Ministry ][of ][Finance']Government of [lndia, ][New ][Delhi]3.The Commissioner [of ][ld#; ][Tax ][(Appeals), ][National ][Faceless ][Appeal]4.?fr!tL";i?3ll'*anaser, [AXls ][Bank ][Ltd', ][c. ]-BB [Hvderabad' ][D'No'6-3-B7e/B']ciJ"n ["nJ., [BesJmpet, Hvderabad-500016']Eii;"rj*;;h"ir;nzg",l [nxrs ][b";[ ][ltd., ][sucnitra_TG, Vennelasadda ] [uchitra]'x"h;;;.'oil [lnJlZn ][oit ][Bunk' Hvderabad-s0Ooss'.]1The lncome [Tax ][officer. ][Ward, ][1 ][1 (4)' ][Signature ][Towers, ][Sy. ][No. 6(P) ][of]h r r, ff #l.,,i x ;i il.' [d ][:l ]e: i:i*ii.i", Bahlz' I . ::l: : : :2.The Assessment [un(' ][rittirn'" ]"l',,i:* ['ial-bepartmeit' ][Ministry ][of ][Finance']Government of [lndia, ][New ][Delhi]3.The Commissioner [of ][ld#; ][Tax ][(Appeals), ][National ][Faceless ][Appeal]4.?fr!tL";i?3ll'*anaser, [AXls ][Bank ][Ltd', ][c. ]-BB [Hvderabad' ][D'No'6-3-B7e/B']ciJ"n ["nJ., [BesJmpet, Hvderabad-500016']Eii;"rj*;;h"ir;nzg",l [nxrs ][b";[ ][ltd., ][sucnitra_TG, Vennelasadda ] [uchitra]'x"h;;;.'oil [lnJlZn ][oit ][Bunk' Hvderabad-s0Ooss'.]
6""'"# iJSFir Av Av [[nAcnu ]][[RAM', ]][[Advocate ][Igq.qPL]][[Igq.qPL]][[rdn ]][tNcl?H/lE ][[ii ]][5c ][[rdn ]][tNcl?H/lE ]
6""'"# iJSFir Av Av [[nAcnu ]][[RAM', ]][[Advocate ][Igq.qPL]][[Igq.qPL]][[rdn ]][tNcl?H/lE ][[ii ]][5c ][[rdn ]][tNcl?H/lE ]
6""'"# iJSFir Av Av [[nAcnu ]][[RAM', ]][[Advocate ][Igq.qPL]][[Igq.qPL]]6# & iI H,r-r.'a [[SnPNn ]][ilebijV, ][[ii ]][5c ][[rdn ]][tNcl?H/lE ][rAx-[oPucl]6# & iI H,r-r.'a [[SnPNn ]][ilebijV, ][[ii ]][5c ][[rdn ]][tNcl?H/lE ][rAx-[oPucl][[FoR ][ttlcotue ]][[ttlcotue ]][[rAX ]][[oPUC]]
6
7
H,r-r.'a [[SnPNn ]]5iil 66 i" [vl.. ][J.Sur.rrrHn, ][Lr. ][sc ][[FoR ][ttlcotue ]][[ttlcotue ]][[rAX ]][[oPUC]]5iil 66 i" [vl.. ][J.Sur.rrrHn, ][Lr. ][sc ][[FoR ][ttlcotue ]][[ttlcotue ]][[rAX ]][[oPUC]]
BITwo CD CoPiesk-
BSR
HIGH COURT
CC TODAY
DATED: 2110212025
ORDERWP.No.SO62 of 2025
1 [srAI]€,(-)v(.1oo21rtB [zffi]].\
DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITION,WITHOUT COSTS
\\
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.