Wp/5065/2018 Of Smt Hogethoppalu Kotresha Setty Sarojamma v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
07 Oct 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/5065/2018 Of Smt Hogethoppalu Kotresha Setty Sarojamma v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
07 Oct 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/5065/2018 Of Smt Hogethoppalu Kotresha Setty Sarojamma v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU|DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV&WRIT PETITION No.5065/2018 (TIT)
Between
Smt. Hogetnoppailu Kotresna Setty Sarojamma,W/o Mr. H. Kotresha Setty,Aged about 65 years,|Residing at: Basaveshwara Complex,M.H. Road,|Chitradurga - 5/77 501.
— Petitloner
(By Sri Harish V.S., Advocate)
And
Tne Income Tax Officer,Ward-2,.Tamatkal Road,Medenalll,Chitradurga - 577 502... Respondent
(By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate)
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the|Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorari or such.other writ of appropriate nature and quash the impugnedassessment order passed by the Respondent U/s 143(3) of the)Income Tax Act, 1961, dated 29.12.2017 for the Assessment.Year 2015-16 i.e., Annexure-C and consequential notice ofdemand issued by the Respondent dated 29.12.2017 for theAssessment Year 2015-16 i.e., Annexure C-1, in the interest ofequity and justice and etc.
This Writ Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court,made the following:|
ORDER
Petitioner files a memo seeking to withdraw the writpetition reserving liberty to claim the benefit Under tne|Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Taking note of the memo and submission made andsubject to the undertaking and observations made whileallowing.R.P.No.185/2021,.the|presentpetitionISdismissed
Sd/-.
JUDGE|
VP
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue