Wp/508/2005 Of A. L. Arora And Ors v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
High Court
15 Mar 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/508/2005 Of A. L. Arora And Ors v. Income Tax Officer And Ors
Date of order
15 Mar 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/508/2005 Of A. L. Arora And Ors v. Income Tax Officer And Ors, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of with the directions that the respondent No.2 namely the Commissioner of Income-tax, Range 27, Mumbai shall consider and decide the petitioners’ application dated 5/10/2001 (Exhibit -B) as early as possible and in no case later than six weeks from the date...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
-= : 1 : =-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARYORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.508 OF 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY
WRIT PETITON NO.508 OF 2005
A.L. Arora & Ors. ..Petitioners.
V/s.
Income Tax Officers and Ors. ..Respondents.
Mr.Mahadeo A.Choudhari for petitioners.
Mr.A.S.Rao for respondents.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND
CORAM : V.C. DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.DATED : 15TH MARCH, 2005.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 15TH MARCH, 2005.
P.C. :-
P.C. :-
1. Heard counsel for both the sides.
2. Rule, returnable forthwith. By consent Rule is
heard finally at this stage.
3. No affidavit-in-reply has been filed by the
Revenue in opposition to the petition. Mr.Rao learned
counsel for revenue submits that the respondent No.2,
namely the Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 27, Bombay
who has jurisdiction in the matter shall consider the
petitioners application dated 5/10/2001 as early as
-= : 2 : =-
possible and positively within six weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
4. In view of the submission of the learned
counsel for the revenue, we are satisfied that it is not
necessary for us to consider the controversy raised in the
petition on merits and interest of justice shall be served
if the respondent No.2 considers the petitioner’s
application dated 5/10/2001 with regard to allowance of
rebate under section 10(14) (ii) read with Rule 2BB.
5. The writ petition is, therefore, disposed of
with the directions that the respondent No.2 namely the
Commissioner of Income-tax, Range 27, Mumbai shall
consider and decide the petitioners’ application dated
5/10/2001 (Exhibit -B) as early as possible and in no case
later than six weeks from the date of receipt of this
order, with no order as to costs.
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(V.C. DAGA, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
-= : 3 : =-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.