Wp/510/2005 Of Vinita Lakhotia v. P. K. Srivastava, Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Tax Central Circle-34
High Court
01 Mar 2005 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/510/2005 Of Vinita Lakhotia v. P. K. Srivastava, Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Tax Central Circle-34
Date of order
01 Mar 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/510/2005 Of Vinita Lakhotia v. P. K. Srivastava, Dy. Commissioner Of Income- Tax Central Circle-34, the High Court (2005) decided the matter.
Decision: Having regard to the fact that the stay has been denied 4-5 years back, we direct the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) to hear the above appeal expeditiously and in any event within a period of three months from today.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.510 OF 2005
Vinita Lakhotia .. Petitioner.
V/s.
P.K. Srivastava, Deputy Commr.
of Income-tax, Central Circle
34, Mumbai & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.A.K. Jasani for the petitioner.
Mr.R.V. Desai, senior counsel with Mr.R. Asokan for
the respondents.
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 1ST MARCH, 2005.
P.C. :
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
the respondents. Rule. Rule made returnable
forthwith. The learned counsel for the respondents
waives service. By consent taken up for final
hearing at this stage.
2. In the above writ petition, the petitioner
has filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income
Tax (Appeals) against the assessment order dated
January 31, 2000 for the block period from April 1,
1987 to November 11, 1997. The said appeal is
pending before the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) since 2000. In the above appeal, the stay
applications were rejected as far back as on November
8, 2000 by the Tax Recovery Officer, Central-III,
2
Mumbai, thereafter by the Deputy Commissioner of
Income Tax, Central Circle-34, Mumbai on November 10,
2000 and subsequently by the Commissioner of Income
Tax, Central Circle-III vide its order dated January
25, 2001.
3. However, for the last 4-5 years though the
appeal has been taken up for hearing, no coercive
measures were adopted. In spite the stay being
denied as far back as in 2000, the revenue has not
taken any steps to recover the dues. Having regard
to the fact that the stay has been denied 4-5 years
back, we direct the Commissioner of Income Tax
(Appeals) to hear the above appeal expeditiously and
in any event within a period of three months from
today.
4. Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances
of the case till final hearing and disposal of the
above appeal, the respondents are directed to
maintain status-quo.
5. Rule made absolute in above terms.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
3
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.