Wp/5130/2020 Of Sri. B V Sreenivasa Reddy v. Income Tax Department
High Court
24 Nov 2020 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/5130/2020 Of Sri. B V Sreenivasa Reddy v. Income Tax Department
Date of order
24 Nov 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/5130/2020 Of Sri. B V Sreenivasa Reddy v. Income Tax Department, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: In view of the said| memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24 DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020|
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA|
;WRIT PETITION NO.5130/2020 (GMRES)
BETWEEN:
1.|SRI. B.V.SREENIVASA REDDY
S/O P.VENKATA REDDY|AGED 49 YEARS.NO.523, 2 FLOOR,EMBASSY WOODS,AGED 49 YEARS.NO.523, 2 FLOOR,EMBASSY WOODS,
OPP. ACCENTURE,CUNNINGHAM ROAD,BENGALURU-56000 1.CUNNINGHAM ROAD,BENGALURU-56000 1.
D2 |SRI D.PARAMESHWARA REDDYS/O D.NAGI REDDY,AGE 65 YEARS|PLOT NO.9, WARD NO.25,INNA REDDY COMPOUND,INFANTRY ROAD,BELLARY-583104.S/O D.NAGI REDDY,AGE 65 YEARS|PLOT NO.9, WARD NO.25,INNA REDDY COMPOUND,INFANTRY ROAD,BELLARY-583104.
PETITIONERS
(BY SRI SUDARSHAN REDDY, ADV.)
AND
1.INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT|THROUGH [TS DEPUTY COMMISSIONERTHROUGH [TS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(3),C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE-560001..C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE-560001..
2DPRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, (CENTRAL) BENGALURU,CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDING,QUEEN'S ROAD, BANGALORE.
~. RESPONDENTS|
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226.& 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482|OF CR.P.C. PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROSECUTION|COMPLAINT U/S 200 CR.P.C. FILED BY THE R-1 I.e. CCNO.1178/2019 BEFORE SPECIAL COURT FOR ECONOMIC.OFFENCES, BANGALORE ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR!ORDERS, THIS.DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioners has filed a memo for.withdrawal.
The memo is taken on record. In view of the said|
memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Liberty is reserved as prayed for.
CnsCT-HR|
Sd/-|JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue