Wp/51692/2017 Of Dr Ashok Kumar Jain v. Office Of The Income Tax Officer
High Court
23 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/51692/2017 Of Dr Ashok Kumar Jain v. Office Of The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/51692/2017 Of Dr Ashok Kumar Jain v. Office Of The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019BRRORE
THR HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI
$$WRIT PETITION Nos.5169201693/2017 (TIT)
Between:
1.Dr. Ashok Kumar Jain»/o Chatarmal JainAged 48 years|Residing at F-201, Adarsh Residency8&[*/]Cross, Jayanagar 38[*/]Block|Bengaluru-560082.
2.Smt. Neelima JainW/o Dr. Ashok Kumar JainAged 47 years|Residing at F-201, Adarsh Residency 8&[*/]Cross, Jayanagar 38[*/]Block|Bengaluru-560082.W/o Dr. Ashok Kumar JainAged 47 years|Residing at F-201, Adarsh Residency 8&[*/]Cross, Jayanagar 38[*/]Block|Bengaluru-560082.
Represented by Power of AttorneyHolder Dr.Ashok Kumar Jain.
.. Petitioners
(By Sri A.V.Nishanth, Advocate)
And
Office of the Income Tax Officer|International Taxation|Ward 1(1), 4[*/]Floor, BMTC Building|80 Feet Road, KoramangalaBengaluru-560047Rep. by Income Tax Officer. |... Respondent
(By Sri Jeevan J.Neeralgi, Advocate)
These writ petitions are filed under Article 226 readwith Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying toset aside the order dated 22.09.2016 vide Annexure-F- inso far aS payment of Rs.8,01,480/- as Income Tax oncapital gain is considered issued by respondent and etc.,
These writ petitions coming on for ‘Orders’ this|day, the Court made the following:-_
ORDER
ThepetitionershaveassailedAnnexure-t,communicationdated|22O9.Y0 16.Thesaid|communication1SrelatingTOCapitalGainTax|computation chart on sale of property No.1801 and1802, A-4, Elita Promende, J.P.Nagar, 7[*/]Phase,Bengaluru-78.
2. Further, the proceedings relating to deduction|ot TDS—ot Rs.20,00,000/-.OT]above|mentioned|transactionWaSnotpaidTO theIncomeTax.Consequently, the notice has been issued. It is to benoticed that before determining the amount mentionedin Annexure-E dated 22.09.2016, the petitioners havenot been heard. Therefore, Annexure-E dated 22.09.2016communication is treated as notice to the petitioners.
3.|The petitioners are hereby directed to furnishtheir explanation-reply within a period of four weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of this order. ©
4On receipt of petitioners explanation tonotice, the concerned Income Tax Officer is herebydirected to proceed to pass an appropriate order afterdueconsiderationot petitioners’explanationTO Annexure-E..
The above direction shall be complied within ajperiod of three months from the date of receipt of a copyof this order.
With the above observations, the writ petitions|stand|disposed of
Sd/-.JUDGE|
!!=
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.