Case LawHigh Court › Wp/517/2005 Of Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagda...

Wp/517/2005 Of Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kolhapur And Ors

High Court 22 Feb 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/517/2005 Of Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kolhapur And Ors
Date of order
22 Feb 2005
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Wp/517/2005 Of Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kolhapur And Ors, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Under these circumstances, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such, with the aforesaid liberty.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 517 OF 2005 Shri Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale .. Petitioner V/s. Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolhapur & Ors. .. Respondents Mr. M.K. Kulkarni for the Petitioner Mr. R.V. Desai for the Respondents CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 22.02.2005 DATED : 22.02.2005 DATED : 22.02.2005 P.C.:- P.C.:- 1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned counsel for the Respondents. The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition and file a proper Petition annexing all the relevant orders and making proper prayers in the same. Under these circumstances, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such, with the aforesaid liberty. (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan