Wp/517/2005 Of Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kolhapur And Ors
High Court
22 Feb 2005 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/517/2005 Of Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kolhapur And Ors
Date of order
22 Feb 2005
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp/517/2005 Of Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Kolhapur And Ors, the High Court (2005) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Under these circumstances, the Petition is allowed to be withdrawn and stands dismissed as such, with the aforesaid liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 517 OF 2005
Shri Babasaheb Appasaheb Jagdale .. Petitioner
V/s.
Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolhapur
& Ors. .. Respondents
Mr. M.K. Kulkarni for the Petitioner
Mr. R.V. Desai for the Respondents
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
CORAM : S. RADHAKRISHNAN &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 22.02.2005
DATED : 22.02.2005
DATED : 22.02.2005
P.C.:-
P.C.:-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the
learned counsel for the Respondents. The learned counsel
for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition
and file a proper Petition annexing all the relevant
orders and making proper prayers in the same. Under
these circumstances, the Petition is allowed to be
withdrawn and stands dismissed as such, with the
aforesaid liberty.
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.