Wp/5209/2012 Of M/S. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
27 Mar 2012 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/5209/2012 Of M/S. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Mar 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/5209/2012 Of M/S. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority v. The Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) decided the matter.
Decision: The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.5209 OF 2012
DATED:27.3.2012
Between:M/s. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority3[rd] Floor, VUDA Complex, SiripuramVisakhapatnamRep. by its Chief Accounts OfficerSmt. D. Vijaya Bharathi … Petitioner
And
The Joint Commissioner of Income TaxRange 1, 4[th] Floor, Direct Taxes BuildingMVP ColonyVisakhapatnamand others … Respondents
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MADAN B. LOKURANDTHE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR
WRIT PETITION NO.5209 OF 2012
ORDER:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Shri Madan B. Lokur)
On a mention being made, this writ petition is taken on board.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner says that this writ petition hasbecome infructuous.
3. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of as infructuous. Interim orders stand vacated.
4. Miscellaneous applications also stand disposed of.
__________________MADAN B. LOKUR, CJ
__________________
SANJAY KUMAR, J 27-3-2012bnr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue