Wp/5267/2024 Of Sandeepani Rural Educational Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
16 Apr 2024 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/5267/2024 Of Sandeepani Rural Educational Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
16 Apr 2024
Assessment year(s)
2018-19
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/5267/2024 Of Sandeepani Rural Educational Society v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2024) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16 DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR -WRIT PETITION NO. 5267 OF 2024 (TIT)
BETWEEN:
SANDEEPANI RURAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY SANDEEPANI VIHARA, NARIMOGARU VILLAGE AND POST, DAKSHINA KANNADA, NARIMOGARU B O KARNATAKA, INDIA – 574 202
(BY SMT. BORKAR SHEETAL SUBODH., ADVOCATE)
…PETITIONER
AND:
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) CIRCLE-2(1), C R BUILDING, ATTAVAR MANGALORE – 575 001 2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION) WARD (1) MANGALORE – 575 001 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE STATE BANK OF INDIA, Digitally signed byVANDANA SNARIMOGA, PUTTUR BRANCH, Location: HighPUTTUR KARNATAKA – 574 202 Court of Karnataka4. THE ASSESSMENT UNIT INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF FINANCE - (FACELESS ASSESSMENT), DELHI – 110 001 5. THE BRANCH MANAGER THE KARNATAKA BANK PUTTUR PUTTUR BRANCH KARNATAKA – 574 201
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.M DILIP., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 & 227 PRAYING TO DIRECT THE CONCERNED COMPETENT R-1 AUTHORITY TO CONSIDER THE APPEAL DTD.20.04.2023 VIDE ANNX-D AND PASS AN ORDER IN RESPECT TO THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR A.Y.2018-19, APPEAL NO. ITBA/AST/S/147/2022-23/1051220912(1) UNDER THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 VIDE ANNX-C DELETE THE ADDITIONS AND BRING TO TAX THE SAID U/S 69 R.W.S 115BBE OF THE ACT AND THEREBY RAISED THE TAX DEMAND OF RS. 3,69,02,080/- OF THE INCOME TAX ACT 1961 & ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo seeking
withdrawal of the present petition with a liberty to file appropriate petition and also to take recourse to such remedies as available in law.
2. The petition is withdrawn without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner.
3. Liberty is also reserved in favour of the petitioner to file a
fresh petition and also to take recourse to such remedies as available in law.
DHA LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 12
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.