Wp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 9(3), Mumbai
High Court
28 Mar 2006 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 9(3), Mumbai
Date of order
28 Mar 2006
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Wp v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Range 9(3), Mumbai, the High Court (2006) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed to be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.528 OF 2006
Wall Street Finance Limited .. Petitioner.
V/s.
Assistant Commissioner of Income
Tax Range 9(3), Mumbai & Others .. Respondents.
Mr.Y.P. Trivedi, senior counsel with Mr.Pankaj
Toprani for the petitioner.
Mr.Ashok Kotangale with Mr.S.R. Chauhan and Mr.A.D.
Nagarjun for the respondents.
CORAM : R.M. LODHA &
J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATED : 28TH MARCH, 2006.
P.C. :
Mr.Y.P. Trivedi, the learned senior counsel
for the petitioner submits that the petitioner may be
permitted to withdraw this writ petition and the
contentions raised in this writ petition may be
permitted to be raised before the Assessing Officer
and if any re-assessment is done, adverse and
prejudicial to the petitioner, the petitioner shall
adopt appropriate proceedings in challenging the
same.
2. The learned counsel for the revenue has no
objection to the reasonable prayer made by the
learned senior counsel for the petitioner.
3. The writ petition is, accordingly, allowed to
be withdrawn with liberty as prayed.
(R.M. LODHA, J.)
2
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue