Wp/5367/2023 Of Mrs. K.hymavathi v. The Income Tax Officer
High Court
24 Jan 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/5367/2023 Of Mrs. K.hymavathi v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
24 Jan 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/5367/2023 Of Mrs. K.hymavathi v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAO(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF JANUARYTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHYANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
WRIT PETITION NO: 5367 OF 2023
Between:
'l . Mrs- K.Hymavathi, W/o Mr. K.Satyanarayana, Aged 74 years, Occ..Housewife, No 8-2-703141P, Road No. ['12, ]Baniara Hills, Hyderabad - 500034, TelanganaHousewife, No 8-2-703141P, Road No. ['12, ]Baniara Hills, Hyderabad - 500034, Telangana
2. Mrs. K.Prathibha, Wo Mr. K.Pratap, Aged 50 years, Occ.- Business, RJo 8-2-703l4lP, Road No.. 12, Banlara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, Telangana.703l4lP, Road No.. 12, Banlara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, Telangana.
...PETITIONERS
AND
1. The lncome Tax Ofiicer, (lnvestigation), Unit - ll, Hyderabad, o/o the Directorof lncome Tax (lnvestigation), Aayakar Bhavan, LB Stadium Road.Basheerbagh, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.of lncome Tax (lnvestigation), Aayakar Bhavan, LB Stadium Road.Basheerbagh, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.
2. The Director of lncome Tax, (lnvestigation), Aayakar Bhavan, LB StadiumRoad, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.Road, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.
3- The Deputy Commissioner of lncome Tax, Circle - 6, Hyderabad, lT Towers,AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.
4. The Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh andTelangana, Hyderabad, Room No.. 922, [gth ]Floor, B Block, lT Towers, 10-2-3, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.Telangana, Hyderabad, Room No.. 922, [gth ]Floor, B Block, lT Towers, 10-2-3, A.C. Guards, Hyderabad - 500 004, Telangana.
5. The Director General of Income, Tax (lnvestigation), CR Buildings, QueensRoad, Bangalore - 560 001, Kamataka.Road, Bangalore - 560 001, Kamataka.
6. The Deputy Director of lncome Tax, (lnvestigation), Unit 2(1), CR BuildingsAnnexe, Queens Road, Bangalore - 560 001 , Karnataka.Annexe, Queens Road, Bangalore - 560 001 , Karnataka.
7. The Asst. Commissionerof lncome Tax, Central Circle 1(2), lll Floor, CRBuildings, Queens Road, Bangalore - 560 001, Karnataka.Buildings, Queens Road, Bangalore - 560 001, Karnataka.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition uMer Article 226 of lhe Constitution of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, Order orDirection, declaring the action of the Respondents in not releasing the [gold]jewellery. pertaining to the Petitioners, seized from their residence, during thecourse of a search uls 132 of the lncome Tax Act, 1961, on [19.12.2014 ][and]
13.02.2015, despite numerous requests, as arbitrary, illegal, bad in law, violativeof the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of Articles 14 and 265of the constitution of lndia, and consequenfly direct the Respondents to releasethe gold jewellery seized during the proceedings dated 13.o2.2o1s, in the interestsof [justice.]
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A.V.A.SIVA KARTIKEYACounsel for the Respondents: SRI J.V.PRASAD, SC FOR !T
The Court made the following: ORDER
TIIE IION,BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM NOSIrY
AND
THE g9g5"E SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
w.P.Ivo.536to f2023
ORDER:Ir,er rron
'ble Si Justice P.S,AIW KOSH4)
Today, when the matter is hken up for hearing,the Iearnedhken up for hearing,the Iearnedcounsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in thelnstant writthat the cause in thelnstant writpettdon has becomeinfructuous artdnothing further remains adjudicated.to beremains adjudicated.to be
Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI A.V.A.SIVA KARTIKEYACounsel for the Respondents: SRI J.V.PRASAD, SC FOR !T
The Court made the following: ORDER
TIIE IION,BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM NOSIrY
AND
THE g9g5"E SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI
w.P.Ivo.536to f2023
ORDER:Ir,er rron
'ble Si Justice P.S,AIW KOSH4)
Today, when the matter is hken up for hearing,the Iearnedhken up for hearing,the Iearnedcounsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in thelnstant writthat the cause in thelnstant writpettdon has becomeinfructuous artdnothing further remains adjudicated.to beremains adjudicated.to be
2Recording, the above madesubmission, the present writpetrtion is dismissed as infructuous.No order as to costs.3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions the present writpetrtion is dismissed as infructuous.No order as to costs.3. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any,shallstand closed.stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//ASSISTANTSD[/.V.KAVITHA]RGISTARSECTION OFFICER
ToI2pff is 3fl f ,yA-xyt{t+'l8?fl 3ffIi"d;" [topucl]Eg PSK.GJP
HIGH
DATED:24 [tO1l2O24]
ORDERWP.No'5367 [of ][2023]
-.a:::"fr.-'i:.,1)1.) ,:''- ir^ [.,.., -.)l]r.ti,l i,,r [i ][i.ll't]t14'
DISMISSING aS ir.rrnucruous [wlrHour ][cosrs']
,w)4
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.