Case LawHigh Court › Wp/54905/2013 Of Jeans Knit Private Limi...

Wp/54905/2013 Of Jeans Knit Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 31 Jul 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/54905/2013 Of Jeans Knit Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
31 Jul 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/54905/2013 Of Jeans Knit Private Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALOREDATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF JULY, 2014| BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE B.V.NAGARATHNA| $WRIT PETITION NO.54905 OF 2013 (1IT)re$WRIT PETITION NOS.54906 OF 2013 (TIT)BETWEEN‘ Jeans Knit Private Limited(A Private company Limited by sharesincorporated under the Companies Act, 1956)Having its offices at:No.21-E-1, 2[+2]Phase|Industrial Area, PeenyaBangalore. Represented herein by its Director|Mr.Laxminarayan Gaur|Son of Sri Nemi Chand SharmaAged about 57 years.Residing at Renaissance Temple BellFlat No./704, 'B’ BIOCK>[.8]Fioor, Industrial Suburb>Rajajinagar, Bangalore — 560 022. ... PETITIONER|(COMMON) (By Snri.Pradeep Naik andShri.Arun SriKumar, Advocates) AND: 1)The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 11 (5), R.P.BulldingNrupatnunga Road|Bangalore — 560 OO1Nrupatnunga Road|Bangalore — 560 OO1 2.Tne Commissioner of Income TaxC.R.Building, Queens Road Bangalore — 560 OO1C.R.Building, Queens Road Bangalore — 560 OO1 ... RESPONDENTS(COMMON) (By Shri.K.V.Aravind, Sr.Standing Counsel)| These Writ Petitions are filed under Articles 276|and 227 of the Constitution of India praying to calli forthe complete record of the case. Direct the R1 to passan order immediately granting the refund of theamount lawfully due to the petitioner and etc., These petitions coming on for. PreliminaryHearing in ‘B’ Group this day, the Court made the|following: COMMON ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that|these writ petitions would not call for any further|orders as the respondent Department has passed the|orders and paid the refund amount to the petitioner. 2D The submission of the learned counsel fortne petitioner is placed on record. 3 3.Learned counsel also states that in thecomputation made with regard to the amounts to berefunded, there are certain arithmetical/mathematicalerrors and liberty may be reserved to the petitioner toapproach the concerned authorities in that regard. aLearned.counsel|for.therespondent|Department has no objection for granting liberty. In the circumstances, the writ petitions aredisposed as no further orders are called for withregard to the prayers made by the petitioner in thesewrit petitions. Liberty is reserved to the petitioner toapproach the concerned authority with regard to anymathematical errors in the revised computation ofrefunded amounts. BSV Sd/-.JUDGE|
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan