Wp/5510/2009 Of Nama Subbarayudu v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCHTWO THOUSAND AND NINEPRESENT THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEand THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION NO : 5510 of 2009 Between: 1 Nama Subbarayudu S/o. Name Venkataramanappa Kodavandla Palli Vilage, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District. 2 Nama Kamalamma W/o. Nama Subba Rayudu Kodavandla Palli Vilage, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District.3 Nama Venkataramana S/o. Nama Subba Rayudu Kodavandla Palli Vilage, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District.4 Nama Parvathamma W/o. N. Venkataramana Kodavandla Palli Vilage, Mudigubba Mandal, Anantapur District. ..... PETITIONER(S) AND 1 Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-I, Anantapur, Anantapur District. Anantapur District. 2 Tax Recovery Officer, O/o. of the Income Tax Office, III Road, Anantapur. Anantapur. 3 Kanumuri Adeseshu Lakshminarayana Raju S/o. K. Suryanarayana Raju Suryanarayana Raju R/o. Yenumulapalli Village, Puttaparthy Mandal, Anantapur District. District. 4 Sub Registrar, O/o. Sub Registrar Office Bukkapatanam Anantapur District. Bukkapatanam Anantapur District. .....RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India prayingthat in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the HighCourt will be pleased to issue an appropriate writ order or directionpreferably one in the nature of writ of Certiorari calling the recordspertaining to the Orders No. MISC/08-9 dt. 27-2-2008 and quash thesame declaring the action of the 1st respondent in passing the aboveorders are illegal, void and arbitrary and in violation of principles ofNatural justice and against the Legal rights conferred by the constitution of India Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.JALAKAM.SAMPATH KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: MR.B.NARASIMHA SARMA The Court made the following :ORAL ORDER: (Per Sri Anil R. Dave, CJ) Learned advocate for the petitioner seeks permission towithdraw the petition so as to enable the petitioner to file a suit on thesubject matter of the petition. Permission is granted. The petition stands disposed of aswithdrawn with no order as to costs. ANIL R. DAVE, CJ 18[th] March, 2009.ksNote: Furnish CC by tomorrow. B/O ks RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J