Case LawHigh Court › Wp/55857/2018 Of M/S Torry Harris Busine...

Wp/55857/2018 Of M/S Torry Harris Business Solutions v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 07 Apr 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/55857/2018 Of M/S Torry Harris Business Solutions v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/55857/2018 Of M/S Torry Harris Business Solutions v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: The petitioner in compliance with Section 4(3) of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 prays before this Hon'ble Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition." In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF APRIL, 2021 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV -WRIT PETITION No.55857/2018 (TIT) Between: M/s. Torry Harris Business Solutions, (Europe) Limited, # 12, North Court, The Courtyard, Woodlands, Bradely Stoke, BS 32 4NQ, United Kingdom (Represented by its authorised representative, Smt. Jyoti Mallya, Aged about 47 years, D/o Sri K. Narasimha Mallya) … Petitioner (By Sri Sharath, Advocate for Sri Chythanya K.K., Advocate) And: 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Circle - 2(1) Room No.440, 4[th] Floor, BMTC Building, 80 ft. Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru - 560 095. 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, (International Taxation), Circle - 2(2) Room No.430, 4[th] Floor, BMTC Building, 80 ft. Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru - 560 095. … Respondents (By Sri K.V. Aravind, Advocate) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash as far as the petitioner is concerned by an appropriate writ or order in the nature of certiorari or otherwise, the impugned notice under Section 148 of the IT Act, Dated 28.03.2017 vide Annexure-A passed by R-1 and etc. This Writ Petition coming on for preliminary hearing this day, the Court, made the following: ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as hereunder: "It is submitted that the petitioner in the above petition has filed an application vide Form No.1 under the Vivad se vishwas scheme and the Income Tax Department has issued a Certificate in Form No.3. The petitioner in compliance with Section 4(3) of Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 prays before this Hon'ble Court to permit the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition." In light of the memo filed, petition is dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE VP
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan