In Wp/5625/2006 Of U. Sanjeev Kumar v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central, the High Court (2006) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the above submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is,therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous, at the stage of admission. ----------------------J.Chelameswar, J 12[th] June 2006 mrk ------------------D.Appa Rao, J
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUREANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWARand THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE D.APPA RAO
WRIT PETITION NO :5625 of 2006
Dated: 12thJune 2006.
Between:
U.Sanjeev Kumar
AND
..... PETITIONER
Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle-5, Hyderabad and others
.....RESPONDENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J.CHELAMESWAR
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.APPA RAO
W.P.NO.5625 OF 2006
ORAL ORDER:
(Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice J.Chelameswar)
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives in the writpetition for adjudication and the matter has become infructuous. Stating so, he seeksdismissal of the same.
Recording the above submission of the learned counsel, the writ petition is,therefore, dismissed as having become infructuous, at the stage of admission.
----------------------J.Chelameswar, J
12[th] June 2006
mrk
------------------D.Appa Rao, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue