Case LawHigh Court › Wp/5637/1999 Of M/S. Vinay Enterprises v...

Wp/5637/1999 Of M/S. Vinay Enterprises v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 14 Feb 2013 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/5637/1999 Of M/S. Vinay Enterprises v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
14 Feb 2013
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/5637/1999 Of M/S. Vinay Enterprises v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Writ Petition Nos. 5637 and 5672 of 1999 Dated: 14-02-2013 Between: T.Srinivas Reddy. …Petitioner And The Commissioner of Income Tax,Hyderabad and others. …Respondents. THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO Writ Petition Nos. 5637 and 5672 of 1999 Oral order(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Goda Raghuram) It is represented by Ms. K.Prabhavathi, learned counselrepresenting Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel that despite lettersaddressed to the petitioner, there is no response and no instructionsfrom the petitioner. In the circumstances, the counsel reports “noinstructions”. In view of the submission on behalf of the counsel for thepetitioner, the writ petitions are dismissed. No costs. _________________________ GODA RAGHURAM, J 14[th] February, 2013 GRR _______________________________ M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan