Wp/564/2023 Of Maitreya Doshi v. Income Tax Department And Ors
High Court
23 Feb 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newas
Parties
Wp/564/2023 Of Maitreya Doshi v. Income Tax Department And Ors
Date of order
23 Feb 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Wp/564/2023 Of Maitreya Doshi v. Income Tax Department And Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.
Decision: 6.Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
GRM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYCRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 564 OF 2023Maitreya Doshi… PetitionerV/s.Income Tax Department & Ors.
… Petitioner
… Respondents
Ms. Gunjan Mangla a/w Ms. Dhanyashree Jadeja & Ms. VanshikaShroff i/b Jadeja & Satiya, Adv. for the Petitioner.None for Income Tax Department/Respondent No. 1.Ms. Anamika Malhotra, APP for the State/Respondent.
P.C. :
CORAM:R. G. AVACHAT, J.DATED:FEBRUARY 23, 2023
Heard.
2.The challenge herein is to the condition (d) in the orderdated 02/01/2023, passed by the Court of Additional ChiefMetropolitan Magistrate, 38[th] Court, Ballard Pier, Mumbai in theCriminal Case bearing No. 528/SW/2019.
3.It is the case for the offence punishable under Section 276-Bread with 278-B of Income Tax Act, 1961. Learned Advocateinforms that the sum of Rs. 92,43,070/- towards TDS has alreadybeen paid. In another case, the similar condition imposed by theTrial Court in a matter arising out of cheque bouncing case, hasbeen withdrawn/set aside by the order of this Court.
4.Inspite of service of notice, none appears for the respondent/Income Tax Department.
5.Considering the nature of offence and the applicant haspermanent place of abode in Mumbai only, the condition (d) in theimpugned order, is hereby withdrawn.
6.Writ petition stands disposed of accordingly.
(R. G. AVACHAT, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.