Case Law › High Court › Wp/5709/2013 Of M/S. Janapriya Engineers...

Wp/5709/2013 Of M/S. Janapriya Engineers Syndicate (Jv) v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 25 Oct 2013 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · taphc

Parties

Date of order

25 Oct 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Wp/5709/2013 Of M/S. Janapriya Engineers Syndicate (Jv) v. The Dy. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition Nos.5731,1911 and 5709 of 2013 DATED:25.10.2013 Between:M/s. Janapriya Properties Pvt. Ltd.,Hyderabad. … Petitioner And The Deputy Commissioner ofIncome Tax,Hyderabad and others. ….Respondents THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition Nos.5731,1911 and 5709 of 2013 Common Order:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan JyotiSengupta) On identical point, this Court has been pleasedto dismiss Writ Petition Nos. 1922 & 1923 of 2013 byjudgment dated 29.7.2013. dismissed. Hence, these three writ petitions are also The miscellaneous petitions, if any pending,shall also stand dismissed. No costs. _____________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J PNB

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.