Wp/5735/2023 Of Odiyoor Sri Vividhoddesha Souharda Sahakar Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
21 Sep 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/5735/2023 Of Odiyoor Sri Vividhoddesha Souharda Sahakar Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
21 Sep 2023
Assessment year(s)
2015-16
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Wp/5735/2023 Of Odiyoor Sri Vividhoddesha Souharda Sahakar Ltd v. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn but subject to all just exceptions in law.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned byNARASIMHAMURTHYVANAMALALocation:HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF SEPTEMBER,2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE B M SHYAM PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO.5735 OF 2023(T-IT)
BETWEEN:
ODIYOOR SRI VIVIDHODDESHA SOUHARDA SAHAKAR LTD., SHRI GURU DEVADATTA SAMSTHANAM, ODIYOOR BANTWAL TALUK, D K DISTRICT 575243 REP BY ITS CEO MR DAYANANDA SHTTY.
…PETITIONER
(BY SRI. MAHESH R UPPIN.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE ROOM NO 356, C R BUILDING I P ESTATE, NEW DELHI 110002. NATIONAL FACELESS APPEAL CENTRE ROOM NO 356, C R BUILDING I P ESTATE, NEW DELHI 110002.
2. INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS CELL CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE BENGALURU 560500. TDS CELL CENTRALIZED PROCESSING CENTRE BENGALURU 560500.
3. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(4) C R BUILDING, N G ROAD, ATTAVARA MANGALURU 575001. WARD 2(4) C R BUILDING, N G ROAD, ATTAVARA MANGALURU 575001.
…RESPONDENTS
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-HOLD AND DECLARE THAT ADJUSTMENT OF TDS REFUNDS OF RS. 24,90,725/- OF THE PETITIONER TOWARDS THE TAX UNDER DEMAND FOR THE AY 2015-16 DATED 23/02/2023 BEARING NO. NIL MARKED AS ANNEXURE-H DURING PENDENCY OF APPEAL BEFORE THE APPELLATE AUTHORITY AS ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT ANY AUTHORITY OF LAW; ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS PROHIBITING AND RESTRAINING RECOVERY BY ADJUSTMENTS OF REFUNDS AGAINST THE DEMAND FOR AY 2015-16; DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS TO REFUND THE EXCESS COLLECTION OF TAX OF RS. 24,90,725/- ALONG WITH ACCRUED INTEREST THEREON DURING THE PENDENCY OF APPEAL BEFORE THE R-1.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Perused the memo for withdrawal dated 22.07.2023. The petition is dismissed as withdrawn but subject to all just exceptions in law.
Sd/- JUDGE
SA ct:sr
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.