Wp/57910/2018 Of M/S Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
27 Sep 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Wp/57910/2018 Of M/S Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
27 Sep 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/57910/2018 Of M/S Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: With the aforesaid observations and directions,writ petition stands disposed of.| Sd/-.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATBD THIS THER 2 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2019
BEFORE:
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICK S.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION No.57910/2018 (T IT)
BETWEEN:
M/S. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA|DEVELOPMENT BOARD.No.49, 4[‘L]AND 5[‘L]FLOOR, ©KHANIJA BHAVAN,RACE COURSE ROAD,BENGALURU-560001(REP BY ITS CEO AND EM,DR.N. SHIVASHANKARA, IAS |AGED ABOUT 47 YBARS|9/O SRI. NINGE GOWDA.
_. PRTITIONBR
(BY SRI SHARATH.S., ADV., FOR ©oRI CHYTHANYA.K.K, ADV.)
AND:
1.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), CIRCLE-1&[‘T]FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE,MISSION ROAD,BBNGALURU-560027
oD THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)&[‘T]FLOOR, UNITY BUILDING ANNEXE,MISSION ROAD,BENGALURU-560027.... RESPONDENTS.
(BY SRI JEEVAN J. NEE RALGI, ADV.)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND22/ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH AS—KAR AS THER PETITIONER IS CONCERNED BY AN APPROPRIATE
-9.-
WRIT OR ORDER IN THR NATURBK OF CHRRITIIORARIOTHERWISE, THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 11.12.2018)PASSED BY THE LEARNED FIRST RESPONDENT FOR CONDUCL|OF SPECIAL AUDIT UNDER SECTION 142(2A) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961, ENCLOSED AS ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.,.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING|IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
The petitioner has challenged the order dated11.12.2018 passed by the first respondent, directingspecial audit of accounts under Section 142 |2A] of theIncome Tax Act, 1961 |‘Act’ for short] relating to theAssessment Year 2016-17.
2 |Learned counsel for the petitioner wouldsubmit that the matter is squarely covered by the orderoT|theCognateBench|oT|thisCourtin.W.P.No.1863/2017andConnectedMatter}D.D.02.01.2018] in the very same assessee’s case relating to’the Assessment Years 2013-14 and 2014-15. Copy ofthe said order is placed before the Court.
-3-
3.|Learned counsel for the Revenue does not|
dispute the same.
4In view of the aforesaid, the impugned orderat Annexure-A dated 11.12.2018 passed under Section
142/2A| of the Act is quashed. The respondent —Assessing Authority shall re-consider the matter in thelight of the observations made in W.P.No.1863/2017—and Connected Matter referred to above.
The respondent — Assessing Authority shall passfresh orders after providing a reasonable and properopportunity of hearing to the petitioner — assessee.
With the aforesaid observations and directions,writ petition stands disposed of.|
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.