Wp/5884/2022 Of Ramesh Kumar Sharma v. Income Tax
High Court
06 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · mphc_db_jbp
Parties
Wp/5884/2022 Of Ramesh Kumar Sharma v. Income Tax
Date of order
06 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/5884/2022 Of Ramesh Kumar Sharma v. Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with theaforesaid liberty.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESHAT JABALPUR
BEFORE
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHEEL NAGU
&
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANINDER S BHATTION THE 6[th] OF MAY, 2022
WRIT PETITION No. 5884 of 2022
Between:-RAMESH KUMAR SHARMA S/O SHRIBAALMUKUND SHARMA , AGED ABOUT 44YEAR S , OCCUPATION: BANK MITRA FORKIOSK BANKING OUTLET R/O VILLAGEMAMDAR POST MAMDAR TEHSIL RAMPURNAIKIN DISTRICT SIDHI M.P. (MADHYAPRADESH)
(BY SHRI PRAVEEN KUMAR PANDEY, ADVOCATE )
.....PETITIONER
AND1.INCOME TAX CHIEF COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX DEPARTMENT AREA HILLSBHOPAL DISTRICT BHOPAL M.P. (MADHYAPRADESH)
2.INCOME TAX COMMISSIONER INCOME TAXO F F I C E DISTRICT JABALPUR (MADHYAPRADESH)
3.INCOME TAX OFFICER 2 INCOME TAX OFFICEOPP. UPBHOKTA FORUM NEARBY DISTRICTCOURT PILI KOTHI ROAD REWA (MADHYAPRADESH)
4.BRANCH MANAGER ALLAHABAD BANKBRANCH RAMPUR NAIKIN DISTRICT SIDHI(MADHYA PRADESH)
.....RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI SANJAY LAL, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT NOS.1 TO
3)
This petition coming on for admission this day, JUSTICE SHEEL
Signature Not VerifiedSAN
Digitally signed by SAVITRI PATELDate: 2022.05.09 18:56:08 IST
NAGU passed the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for petitioner after arguing for a while prays forwithdrawal of this petition filed under Section 226 of Constitution of India withliberty to pursue the remedy of appeal already availed by petitioner underSection 246-A of Income Tax Act. The appeal is informed to be pending sincemore than one year.
Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with theaforesaid liberty.
(SHEEL NAGU)(MANINDER S BHATTI)JUDGEJUDGEsp
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue