Case LawHigh Court › Wp/599/2006 Of Mumbai Metropolitan Regio...

Wp/599/2006 Of Mumbai Metropolitan Region Devlopment Authority v. Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) And 2 Ors

High Court 07 Mar 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Wp/599/2006 Of Mumbai Metropolitan Region Devlopment Authority v. Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) And 2 Ors
Date of order
07 Mar 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Wp/599/2006 Of Mumbai Metropolitan Region Devlopment Authority v. Director Of Income Tax (Exemptions) And 2 Ors, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Decision: In the light of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we allow the writ petition to be withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.599 OF 2006 Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority, Mumbai .. Petitioner. V/s. Director of Income-tax (Exemptions), Mumbai & Ors. .. Respondents. Mr.J.D. Mistry with Mr.R. Murlidhar i/b. A.K. Jasani for the petitioner. Smt.N.V. Masurkar with Mr.B.M. Chaterjee for the respondents. CORAM : R.M. LODHA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 7TH MARCH, 2006. P.C. : Heard. 2. That the petitioner has already filed reply to the show cause notice under Section 12AA(3) dated 8th February, 2006 for cancellation of registration granted under Section 12AA(i) is not in dispute. 3. As regards the notice issued to the petitioner to show cause as to why exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act be not denied, it appears that no reply has been filed. 4. Since the reply has already been filed by the petitioner to the show cause notice under Section 12AA(3), we find no justifiable ground to invoke the extra ordinary jurisdiction. At this stage, the 2 learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the writ petition. 5. In the light of the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, we allow the writ petition to be withdrawn. We, however, observe that in the event of the Director of Income Tax (exemptions) passing an order adverse to the petitioner cancelling registration granted under Section 12AA(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, such order shall not come into operation for a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the order by the petitioner. 6. All contentions raised in the writ petition are kept open to be agitated before the Director of Income Tax (Exemptions). (R.M. LODHA, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan