Case Law › High Court › Wp/6001/2006 Of B.p.shroff v. The Commis...

Wp/6001/2006 Of B.p.shroff v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Iii, Pune And Ors

High Court 08 Jan 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newas

Parties

Date of order

08 Jan 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Wp/6001/2006 Of B.p.shroff v. The Commissioner Of Income-Tax Iii, Pune And Ors, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Decision: Accordingly, petition stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITON NO.6001 OF 2006 WRIT PETITON NO.6001 OF 2006 Shri. B.P.Shroff ..Petitioner. V/s. The Commissioner of Income Tax-II & Ors...Respondents. None for petitioner. Mr.Ashok with S.R.Chauhan, A.D. Nagarjun and Pravind Gaikwad for respondent. CORAM : DR. S.RADHAKRISHNAN AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 8TH JANUARY, 2007. P.C. :- None appears for the petitioner. Mr. Kotangale for the respondent is present. Perused our order dated 11th December, 2006. In spite of several opportunities being given, the petitioner has chosen not to file an affidavit pursuant to our order dated 10th October, 2006. It is made clear in our order dated 11th December, 2006 that if affidavit is not filed before 8th January, 2007, the petition will be dismissed. Accordingly, petition stands dismissed. (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.