Wp/605/2013 Of Umesh Nandlal Shahu v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur
High Court
11 Dec 2013 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · testcase
Parties
Wp/605/2013 Of Umesh Nandlal Shahu v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur
Date of order
11 Dec 2013
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Wp/605/2013 Of Umesh Nandlal Shahu v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Nagpur, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYNAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR.
Criminal Writ Petition No.605/2013
(Umesh Mandal Shahu .vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur)with
Criminal Writ Petition No.607/2013
(Mahesh s/o Lalaiprasad Shahu .vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax,
Nagpur)
with
Criminal Writ Petition No.608/2013
(M/s Shahu Sons, through its Proprietor .vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Nagpur)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram,appearances, Court's orders or directions Court's or Judge's orders.and Registrar's orders
Mr. S.N. Bhattad, Advocate for Petitioners
CORAM : P.D.KODE, J.DATED : DECEMBER 11, 2013
1.Heard.
2.The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the petitions with a request of giving appropriate direction regarding observations made by the Court of Session in order impugned while dismissing the applications for revision preferred by petitioners for assailing order of process issued by trial Court.
3.Considering the purpose for which said observations pointed regarding the burden of proof upon the petitioners were made by the Court of Session, i.e. predominantly for examining legality, correctness of an order of issue of process issued, request deserves
consideration.
4.Thepetitions stand disposed of as withdrawn with a direction to the trial Court to decide the proceedings before it in accordance with the law and uninfluenced by the observations made by the Court of Session at interim stage for limited purpose of examining legality, propriety and correctness of order of issuing process assailed in the applications in revision preferred.
JUDGE
halwai
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.