Case LawHigh Court › Wp/6368/2013 Of M/S.suresh Productions v...

Wp/6368/2013 Of M/S.suresh Productions v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 30 Jan 2015 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Wp/6368/2013 Of M/S.suresh Productions v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
30 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/6368/2013 Of M/S.suresh Productions v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as being withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.6368 of 2013 DATED:30.01.2015 Between:M/s. Suresh Productions,Hyderabad. … PetitionerAnd The Additional Commissioner of Income Tax,Range-13,Hyderabad. ….Respondent THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI KALYAN JYOTISENGUPTA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR Writ Petition No.6368 of 2013 Order:(per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Sri Kalyan Jyoti Sengupta) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his clientdoes not want to proceed with the matter. Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as being withdrawn. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if anypending, shall also stand closed. No order as to costs. __________________ K.J. SENGUPTA, CJ _________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J 30[th] January, 2015 Pnb
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan