Case Law › High Court › Wp/6422/2019 Of R.k.m Powergen Private L...

Wp/6422/2019 Of R.k.m Powergen Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 27 Jul 2022 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · hc_cis_mas

Parties

Date of order

27 Jul 2022

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Wp/6422/2019 Of R.k.m Powergen Private Limited v. The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

W.P.Nos.6422, 7291, 7284, 6425,6426, 6429, 6431 & 7298 of 2019and WMP Nos.7993, 7995, 7998,7242, 7239, 7232, 7234 &7236 of2019 and W.M.P.Nos.2884, 2885,2886, 2880, 2881, 2883, 2887 &2882of 2021 Dr.ANITA SUMANTH,J. A memo dated 12.10.2022 is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner pointing out a typographical error in order dated 27.07.2022, wherein the name of the petitioner in W.P.Nos.7291, 7284 and 7298 of 2019 has been typed as 'R.K.M. Powergen Private Limited' instead of 'R.K. Powergen Private Limited'. 2. The name of the petitioner in orderdated27.07.2022in W.P.Nos.7291, 7284 and 7298 of 2019 shall be read as 'R.K. Powergen Private Limited'. 3. Except the aforesaid change in the name of the petitioner, order dated 27.07.2022 shall remain unaltered. 12.10.2022 sl Note: Registry is directed to issueamended order forthwith.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.